Shared by Sarah Chabane
climate change is progressing, extreme weather events are occurring more frequently. As I explained in Chapter 3 of my book “A Guide to a Healthier Planet”, extreme weather events include heat waves, tornadoes, wildfires, floods, and droughts. Not every country is affected by these events in the same way, meaning that some places will experience tornadoes more frequently while other places will be facing droughts more often and longer. Drought is different from most of the other extreme weather events as it can last a lot longer: often a decade or more. This can be caused by natural processes such as interactions between the ocean and atmosphere, heat waves, and El Niño. El Niño happens when deep water that normally rises to the surface in the Pacific Ocean remains deep. This means fewer nutrients and less cold water reach the surface, resulting in warmer, nutrient-poorer water. Apart from natural causes of droughts, other causes involve human behavior, such as fires and global warming caused by carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Global warming impacts droughts through increasing temperatures that cause more water from the ground to evaporate, and through reducing soil moisture, the amount of flowing water, and the water level in water storage areas such as streams and lakes. They can be categorized based on intensity: - Meteorological drought: a lack of precipitation such as rain and snow and depends on how much water in a certain area evaporates - Agricultural drought: a lack of water in the soil, causing low soil moisture and a lack of water for plants - Hydrological drought: a period of unusually low surface or underground water levels and a reduced water flow below and above the ground. This drought usually follows meteorological and agricultural drought - Socioeconomic drought: the inability to meet human needs because of water shortage As these types of drought differ in intensity, the impact differs as well. For example, while meteorological droughts affect terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, they usually don’t lead to a lack of drinking water for us. And this type of drought usually has a small impact on energy production. On the other end of the scale, socioeconomic droughts can for example lead to illness and conflicts, and in the worst case to death. Also, the impact differs between countries, across areas within countries, and within the population, especially when an area is unprepared for drought. This is how droughts can impact our health: 1. Water-related effects The first way droughts impact our health is through water-related effects. Even though less water is involved in a drought, the risk of diseases being spread by water is higher. This is because drought impacts not only water availability but also water quality. How water quality is affected by droughts is a complex mechanism that depends on climate and environmental conditions and watershed characteristics. A watershed is an area that drains rainwater or melted snow to streams, lakes, or wetlands. For example, when less water flows during drought, water stays in the same place for longer. This allows pollutants such as chemicals, metals, and other solid particles to gather in this stagnant water. And the number of harmful microorganisms have the opportunity to grow. This makes it more likely that we are affected by diseases. Unfortunately, climate change is expected to worsen these effects because harmful organisms are more likely to spread in warmer and saltier water (further reading: How does Climate Change Impacts Plants in Urban Environment). The number of nutrients decreases and water can become less clear during drought, too. This is because fewer nutrients can be transported to other areas, soil erodes more easily due to evaporating water, and internal processes such as nutrient cycling can be affected. Nutrient cycling involves exchanging nutrients between living organisms, the environment, and non-living components to support the life and growth of organisms. This can lead to reduced nutrients and oxygen in water, making plants and animals struggle to survive, and can make water unsafe to drink. While water availability and quality are reduced during droughts, the need for water can increase, for instance, to water plants. This is critical as it makes us more likely and maybe even force us to use unsafe water. This can in turn make us more likely to become ill. This is especially the case for poor populations with limited access to water and sanitation. 2. Food-related effects The second way droughts impact our health is through food-related effects. These effects are closely related to decreased food security and nutrition — in the worst case even starvation — during a drought. Especially low- and middle-income countries are affected because they have fewer opportunities to make up for food scarcity, for example because of poor transportation networks and limited access to other markets. Climate change is expected to increase food insecurity and malnutrition through droughts, which is critical as already about 1 in 3 people worldwide don’t have access to adequate food. This is because droughts cause fewer crops to grow, limit the availability of livestock, and affect fisheries. This means that both the quantity and quality of food in drought-affected areas change. Also, food prices will change because of limited availability, which will affect the quantity and quality of food people can afford. The consequences of limited quantity and quality of food — and the resulting under-nutrition — are far-reaching. For example, children who survive under-nutrition often suffer from long-term cognitive damage, physical underdevelopment, and a higher risk of infections, such as malaria. Also, pregnant women who are under-nourished have a higher risk of bearing early and giving birth to babies with low birth weight. And in all of us, undernutrition can lead to mental health issues, including more stress, anxiety, and depression. In extreme cases, these mental health issues can trigger suicide. 3. Virus-related effects The third way droughts impact our health is through virus-related effects. How droughts cause these effects is complex, as several changes can happen at the same time. For example, the number of viruses that are spread by mosquitoes can increase when storage containers are filled with limited available water. At the same time, the number of breeding grounds can decrease because droughts reduce the number of breeding grounds for mosquitoes in natural environments. Also, other animals that carry viruses are affected by droughts, such as ticks. Ticks thrive in wet environments, which means that their numbers decrease during droughts. 4. Air-related effects The fourth way droughts impact our health is through air-related effects. Air-related effects are caused by droughts because they impact air quality by increasing the concentration of air pollutants. For example because of more and more severe wildfires and dust. Inhaling these pollutants can block our airways, cause inflammation, and make blood more likely to form clots. This can lead to problems with our heart and blood vessels. In the worst case, it can even lead to death. These risks are especially high in cities that also suffer from other pollution sources, such as particles from vehicles that burn fuel. (Further reading on the impact of dust on our health: How Earthquake Debris Affects The Environment and Our Health) In this video, you can see a huge dust cloud in Parkes (United Kingdom). This cloud was caused by a strong low air pressure area, which picked up a lot of dust from the very dry ground: https://youtu.be/Esz6ne9x9yM Apart from inorganic particles, air pollutants can also include organic matter, such as harmful microorganisms, allergens, and fungi spores. They can irritate the lungs after inhaling them, and increase the chance of diseases, allergies, and infections. Such diseases are more likely to spread during droughts as they can more easily be carried by the wind. How we can take action So, climate change makes meteorological, agricultural, and hydrological drought worse by less rainfall and snow, and by higher temperatures that cause more water to evaporate. This affects us as this can turn into a socioeconomic drought, meaning that we don’t have enough water to meet our needs. But there are practical ideas of what you and I can do to prevent droughts and reduce the negative impact of droughts: - Installing a rain barrel to capture rainwater - Removing pollutants from water, for example by using plants and microorganisms (further reading: Chapter 11 of A Guide to a Healthier Planet: “Pollution Solutions: Removing Pollutants from Soil and Water”) - Reusing wastewater (further reading: 10 Technologies That Allow Us To Reuse Our Daily Wastewater) - Reducing water use, for example by washing at the sink or having shorter showers - Harvesting water when drinking water runs out (further reading: 2 Methods That Can Save Us When Freshwater Runs Out) - Educating yourself in resilient and sustainable agriculture - Voting for a political party that takes climate change seriously and puts solutions into practice Which one of these can you implement in your daily life? And do you have further ideas of what you and I could do? Thank you in advance for putting them into practice and sharing them in a comment to this question to inspire all of us. --- Did you enjoy this article? Then I’m sure you’ll love my book “A Guide to A Healthier Planet” as well. Have a peek inside the book at: https://www.sustainabledecisions.eu/guide-to-a-healthier-planet --- About the author Dr. Erlijn van Genuchten is a an internationally recognized environmental sustainability expert. She is a science communicator, helping scientists in the fields of nature and sustainability increase the outreach of their results and allowing us all to put scientific insights into practice and contribute to a sustainable future. Erlijn has inspired thousands of people around the world — for example — by supporting the United Nations with her expertise, her book “A Guide to A Healthier Planet” published by Springer Nature, her YouTube channel Xplore Nature, and her posts on social media. Credit Chivangulula, F. M., Amraoui, M., & Pereira, M. G. (2023). The Drought Regime in Southern Africa: A Systematic Review. Climate, 11(7), 147. Salvador, C., Nieto, R., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., García-Herrera, R., Gimeno, L., & Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M. (2023). Public health implications of drought in a climate change context: A critical review. Annual review of public health, 44, 213–232.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
On Earth Day, We Don't Have Time celebrated its sixth anniversary by inviting representatives from nearly 100 leading financial companies in our network under the theme 'Move the Money.' The event was co-organized by our partner SPP, a leading Swedish occupational pension provider and a frontrunner in divesting from fossil fuels. Among the guests in the crowded room and online were representatives from many of the largest banks in the Nordics and other international banks, investors, and fund managers. Nick Nuttall, former UN spokesperson for the Paris Agreement, gave an insightful presentation on the role of climate finance in the UN negotiations since the Paris Agreement – and the big focus of finance at this year’s upcoming UN Climate conference COP29 in Baku. Boaz Paldi, Creative Director at the United Nations Development Programme, UNDP, talked about the creation of Weather Kids, the organization's new global campaign to raise climate awareness, and how this taps into We Don’t Have Time’s Move the Money campaign. Johanna Lundgren Gestlöf, Head of Sustainability at SPP, gave an investor view on biodiversity and ecocide, while Ingmar Rentzhog, CEO and founder of We Don’t Have Time, focused on the urgent need to shift investments at scale from the fossil fuel industry to green solutions. The event turned interactive when moderator Catarina Rolfsdotter-Jansson invited all on-site and online guests to participate in a workshop on climate and finance. The workshop included a Mentimeter poll and a discussion around the results. Here are some of the questions and reactions: For more on We Don’t Have Time’s coverage on climate and finance: - Move the Money campaign site - ”Without finance shifting, we won't make it”, feature story by Nick Nuttall, former UN spokesperson for the Paris Agreement - “We need a quantum leap this year in climate finance" – Full speech by Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary, UN Climate Change - New study in Nature: Climate-change damages could amount to $38 trillion per year by 2050 - Our interview with AP7 on active ownership in fossil fuel companies - Our interview with Jakob König, Head of Fair Finance Guide Sweden
•
•
22 h
That's an outrageous figure!
•
•
1 d
More people need to know about the reality of climate change and its effects. Not enough know about it.
•
•
1 d
The figure on screen is just disheartening.All that money being invested in coal,oil &gas companies is insane. If these resources were moved to green and renewable energy projects we would really be far.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Varsa Mahananda
4 d
•
“On climate change, we often don't fully appreciate that it is a problem. We think it is a problem waiting to happen.” - Kofi Annan I was looking out the window today when I saw this bird trying to build a nest with twigs. When I first noticed the bird, it held a piece of twig four times the size of its whole body and was trying to walk fast enough to build momentum to fly up to its nest on a nearby tree. It made multiple attempts to fly but the twig kept falling off given its weight. The bird wouldn’t lose hope. I kept watching the bird struggle for a long time, but after several attempts, it finally managed to get the twig up to its nest. Imagine my happiness at the bird’s success! But then again, it is an everyday struggle for the bird, while it was a one-time watch for me. The point being? We lose hope and give up so soon at the sight of a little struggle and start complaining. But look at the bird. It has no option but to persevere. I saw a similar sight of perseverance at the Global Climate Strike held in Stockholm on the 19th of April, 2024. Our climate is getting hotter and we are starting to see some drastic changes to the planet which is neither good for us nor for our children. On an individual level, making any changes to the climate situation can seem too daunting and impossible to achieve. However, to the people who were part of the strike, this was not the case. They have this united belief that if they fight for this just cause, they will finally achieve what they aim: a cleaner and greener planet. Their hope and determination was contagious. Although not a part of the actual strike, I did walk alongside them to observe how the strike was proceeding. I noticed a man with his little daughter (she must have been about 3) in a stroller participating in the strike. The little girl was cold (it was zero degrees) so the father covered her up with a little shawl. It would have been much easier to leave the group and take shelter from the cold and nobody would have missed them. But both father and child felt their presence was necessary in this fight for a better climate future. I was amazed at their perseverance in the same way the bird with the twig amazed me! They both believe they are an important part of the solution, and we need more people like them. It was a two-kilometer walk in zero-degree temperature but the excitement and determination did not fall short. The sight of so many people with so many colorful banners and placards singing along to fight for a greener climate was extremely contagious. The walk began in Odenplan and ended at Sergels Torg in the heart of Stockholm where climate activists spoke about their fight against climate change for so many years, without fail, despite all odds. One lady, Matilda Bergström, famously known as Rebel Mama, was even deemed a security risk and a threat to democracy by the government because of her constant fight to claim a better future for the children of today and tomorrow! She is a part of the Mothers’ Rebellion for Climate Justice, fighting for the future of the children, both her own, and of the world. Although most of the speeches were in Swedish, and very little in English, therefore difficult for me to understand, the energy of the whole ensemble was so high, it was almost electric! As an individual I might feel inconsequential and hopeless at the incapability to make a change, but you have to be there to experience the determination of these people to demand a change to believe that all hope is not lost yet. Just like the bird, we also have to start realizing that we have no option but to persevere. We need more and more people to participate in this cause so we save our planet, because after all, there is no planet B, and all of us have to live on this one and only mass of rock and water. Learn more about the Global Climate Strike held in Stockholm last Friday: https://www.instagram.com/p/C58fD3HtO51/?igsh=MW4yN3BuMjIweHUxbg== https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7188162760470380545/
•
•
2 d
Thanks for sharing Varsa, it was an honour to share this experience with you!
•
•
4 d
These strikes and marches are so important. We often feel alone fighting against giants, but the strikes remind us that we are not alone and give us hope. Thanks for sharing how you experienced it!
•
•
2 d
It's heartening to see individuals, like the father with his daughter, braving the cold to be part of the solution. 👨👧 Their actions inspire us to keep pushing forward despite the challenges. Let's continue to raise our voices and take action for a sustainable planet because there's no planet B. 🌿
Sarah Chabane
2 d
•
A recent study has unveiled a troubling reality: fewer than 60 multinational corporations bear the responsibility for over 50% of the world's plastic pollution, with 5 major players contributing a staggering quarter of this total. The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, Nestlé, Danone, and Altria ... Congrats! You are top polluters. 🥳🎉 Led by Lisa Erdle from The 5 Gyres Institute, the study shows the direct link between plastic production and environmental degradation and proves once again that "production really is pollution." In the past 5 years, an international team meticulously collected and analysed over 1.87 million pieces of plastic waste across 84 countries. Shockingly, the bulk of this detritus comprised single-use packaging for food, beverages, and tobacco products. Despite growing public awareness and voluntary commitments by some corporations, plastic production continues to surge, with a mere 9% of plastic being recycled. As discussions on a UN Treaty for Plastic Pollution unfold, the study's findings reinforce the urgent need for a binding international agreement focusing on production measures. We can't keep producing fossil-based plastics that will end up polluting our environment and killing us slowly. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/apr/24/survey-finds-that-60-firms-are-responsible-for-half-of-worlds-plastic-pollution
131 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
1 d
What angers me is that countries keep on giving these multinational polluters licenses to operate.
•
•
2 d
Great. Another reason to not buy Coca-Cola!
•
•
2 d
Climate health over mild inconvenience.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Marine Stephan
2 d
•
Esther Duflo, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, presented a proposal to the G20 summit that suggests taxing global corporations and the world’s top billionaires to raise money for climate adaptation in countries that are most impacted by the climate crisis. The tax would range from 15-20% for multinational corporations and 2% for the world's top 3,000 billionaires. These 2 taxes could raise up to $400 billion per year for a loss, damage, and adaptation fund. “Richer citizens emit much more than poorer citizens,” Duflo wrote in her proposal to the G20. But the brunt of extreme heat will be felt by poorer citizens who tend to live in hotter regions of the world. “Moreover, poverty makes it harder to adapt to warm temperatures,” she said. This is the first time that a climate tax also aiming to address inequalities has been suggested and proposed to leaders of G20. This is pretty good that someone with such renown would advocate this. Read more: https://heated.world/p/nobel-prize-winning-economist-calls?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2473&post_id=143911851&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoxMTYzNzY0MywicG9zdF9pZCI6MTQzOTExODUxLCJpYXQiOjE3MTM5NTY5NTQsImV4cCI6MTcxNjU0ODk1NCwiaXNzIjoicHViLTI0NzMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.M0dcmE4UD8Ne_P9QLT4CZ4-NEGCSKBo2pmKp4LlEyvQ&r=6xfnv&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
22 more agrees trigger social media ads
•
•
1 d
A very brilliant proposal that should be adopted. The taxes are very reasonable and most of these conglomerates actually cause so much emissions so its only fair.
•
•
2 d
This is a tough measure that is welcome for the sake of our environment. I hope the proposal tabled by @EstherDuflo will be adopted by the G20 members. However it is important to note that funds from this should be well utilised.
•
•
2 d
This is exactly the kind of bold leadership we need on climate change. $400 billion a year for adaptation could make a HUGE difference.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Julien
2 d
•
Benefiting from the constant efforts of the Paris City Hall to make the French capital greener and better for life overall, Paris now sees more people commuting via bicycle than car. https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2024/04/06/french-revolution-cyclists-now-outnumber-motorists-in-paris
French Revolution: Cyclists Now Outnumber Motorists In Paris
Official measurements have found that Paris is rapidly becoming a city of cyclists.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carltonreid/2024/04/06/french-revolution-cyclists-now-outnumber-motorists-in-paris
32 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
•
1 d
This is encouraging, bicycles are pollution - free and it's also healthy to ride a bicycle
•
•
2 d
Great news!! Increasing number of cyclists in Paris aligns with the global movement towards creating a more sustainable and environmentally friendly urban environment. This shift reflects a growing preference for alternative modes of transportation that reduce reliance on fossil fuels and promote cleaner, healthier commuting options.
•
•
2 d
The shift towards more people commuting by bicycle than by car is a testament to the success of their initiatives in promoting sustainable transportation options.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Patrick Kiash
2 d
•
•
The president of Democratic Republic of Congo or his government should highlight and take needed action in the link between illegal logging, corruption, and conflict in the eastern DRC. The goverment of DRC should emphasize its detrimental effects on governance and livelihoods. It underscores how corrupt officials collaborate with loggers, perpetuating a cycle of abuse of public power for private gain. Additionally, the loss of tax revenue worsens the situation, depriving communities of essential resources. Illicit logging not only causes environmental degradation but also contributes to social issues such as human trafficking and child labor. This report calls for concerted efforts to dismantle criminal networks and hold government-embedded actors accountable to address the root causes of the problem. Additionally, the goverment of Congo should inform and warn the Chinese government whose it's people facilitate this illegal trade be success according to the below published report. Kenyan government too and Uganda goverment they should be informed to check all papers in their boarders too about the role of international demand, including from China, in driving the illicit timber trade and exacerbating the problem. I feel all this governments have a responsibility to take action to address these issues, including strengthening law enforcement, implementing regulations to curb illegal logging, and promoting sustainable forestry practices. Below is the link-:) https://adf-magazine.com/2024/04/corruption-in-logging-decimates-drc-forests-to-feed-foreign-markets/?twclid=2-2e7gpev60qx3r3xp1kbrru59
Corruption in Logging Decimates DRC Forests to Feed Foreign Markets - Africa Defense Forum
ADF STAFF A new four-part investigation by the Pulitzer Center Rainforest Investigations Network and The Africa Report shows how trees felled in the Democratic Republic of the Congo make their way across borders with the help of official corruption and a lack of oversight. The report details how mahogany and other species of trees are […]
https://adf-magazine.com/2024/04/corruption-in-logging-decimates-drc-forests-to-feed-foreign-markets/?twclid=2-2e7gpev60qx3r3xp1kbrru59
7 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
•
23 h
I weep for our fellow east African country.Corruption, conflict and logging in one sentence??and the president doesn't care!Too sad
•
•
2 d
This is despicable.. Corruption at the expense of future generations? The president owes an apology to the people of DRC and this needs to end
•
•
2 d
The failure of the Democratic Republic of Congo's government to address illegal logging, corruption, and conflict in the eastern region is appalling.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Marine Stephan
4 d
•
Another day, another setback in the fight against climate climate, and another climate villain. The winner of this "Oh you really thought I couldn't do anything worse for the climate" award? Unilever 🥳 Unilever has now decided to scale back its environmental and social pledges. Yes, you read me right. Amidst the climate crisis and rising social inequalities, Unilever just decided to give up, give up on our planet, give up on humans, give up on our future. On April 19, Unilever's CEO, Hein Schumacher, confirmed plans to water down the company’s ethical pledges on a range of issues including plastic usage and equal pay. Yes, just like that. But who cares about ethics huh? Unilever is one of the largest users of plastic packaging and had previously promised to halve its use of virgin plastics by 2025. Instead (yes, again another broken promise), it will now aim for a reduction of 1/3 by 2026. This means about 100,000 tonnes (!) more fresh plastic will be produced and wasted yearly. Oh, but this isn't all. The company is also abandoning a pledge to pay direct suppliers a living wage by 2030. I mean yeah, who cares about humans being able to afford living huh... (!!!) It is also dropping a commitment that 5% of its workforce will be made of people with disabilities by 2025. Their excuse? Blablabla we receive pressure from shareholders in corporations (banks, oil companies, etc.) to cut costs and focus more on stock market performance than green projects. That makes sense, right? Money matters way more than our future, our planet, and our fellow humans! But congratulations to Unilever for being a liar and climate villain! This is why we should never trust companies and believe in their pledges unless they are actually ACTING on them 🤡 Read more: https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/business/2024/apr/19/unilever-to-scale-back-environmental-and-social-pledges
21 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
•
2 d
@Unilever this is a HUGE disappointment. We're in a climate crisis and you're BACKING DOWN on plastic reduction and social responsibility?
•
•
3 d
It is a shame to see Unilever in this category ... something needs to change urgently
•
•
4 d
It truly is heartbreaking to witness such actions, especially considering the urgency of addressing climate change and social inequalities. It's important for individuals and organizations to continue advocating for sustainable practices and ethical commitments to safeguard the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Ingmar Rentzhog
6 d
•
•
Shortly after J.P. Morgan exited the UN Climate Action 100+, they continued their investments in fossil fuels and began advocating that phasing out fossil fuels is too difficult and costly. However, this claim is the exact opposite of the truth. According to a new scientific paper published in Nature, the cost of global warming exceeding 2 degrees Celsius could reach $38 trillion USD per year. In contrast, investing $4.5 trillion USD per year in clean energy until 2030 is needed to keep warming under 1.5 degrees Celsius. J.P. Morgan has the financial resources and influence to make the right choices. However, they are not thinking long-term, and therefore, we, their clients, need to move our money to financial institutions that are making the right choices. If you had to choose between paying $38 trillion USD annually or investing $4.5 trillion USD now, what would you do? For me, the choice is very simple. It is not only the best financial decision, but it is also the choice where we opt for life over a dystopian future. Source: JP Morgan: https://www.ft.com/content/352b38a7-f298-4b54-adc2-f4cc1b17444b Source 38 trillion USD needed if we fail: https://www.axios.com/2024/04/18/climate-change-damages-38-trillion
JPMorgan warns of need for ‘reality check’ on phasing out fossil fuels
US bank says higher interest rates, inflation and global conflict have dented outlook for energy transition
https://www.ft.com/content/352b38a7-f298-4b54-adc2-f4cc1b17444b
44 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
•
5 d
JP Morgan should make the right decisions and fund clean energy projects, if not let's movethemoney
•
•
•
6 d
#movethemoney
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Munene Mugambi
3 d
•
It's time to address the elephant in the room. While you champion green energy initiatives and tout yourself as a leader in the fight against climate change, the reality on the ground tells a different story. The United States has reached record highs in crude oil production under your watch, contradicting the very principles you claim to uphold. Your actions speak louder than words and the discrepancy between your rhetoric and the nation's oil production levels is glaring. You cannot champion renewable energy while simultaneously bolstering the fossil fuel industry. It's a contradiction that undermines your credibility and erodes public trust. This hypocrisy is not only damaging to your reputation but also to the planet. Climate change is a pressing crisis that demands genuine leadership and decisive action. We cannot afford lip service and empty promises while the Earth continues to suffer the consequences of our inaction. It's time to make a choice, Biden. Either commit wholeheartedly to the transition to green energy and take meaningful steps to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, or stop deceiving the public and align yourself transparently with big oil interests. The American people deserve honesty and accountability from their leaders, especially on issues as critical as climate change. Failure to address this hypocrisy undermines the integrity of your administration and jeopardizes our collective future. The time for action is now, Mr. President. The world watches and history will judge us by the decisions we make today. Choose wisely. https://www.vox.com/climate/24098983/biden-oil-production-climate-fossil-fuel-renewables
18 more agrees trigger social media ads
•
•
6 h
Biden administration must showcase their commitments to counter the fossil fuels.
•
•
3 d
President Biden needs to step up his game on green energy. If he doesn't, he's just another politician making empty promises. It's time for action, not just words. Failure to deliver on his commitments would be a betrayal of trust and a slap in the face to all those who are counting on him to lead us towards a sustainable future.
•
•
3 d
Truly sad to see the push for more fossil fuels under the Biden administration
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Nick Nuttall
3 d
Remarks by Nick Nuttall, the UN Spokesperson for the Paris Climate Agreement and We Don’t Have Time Presenter at an Event Hosted at the Nordic Pension Fund SPP Stockholm, 22 April 2024--The next UN climate conference in Baku, COP29, is being billed as the finance COP. So how fast and how big are the financial flows right now in terms of financing a transition to a low carbon economy that meets the goals of the landmark Paris Climate Agreement of 2015? Let us remind ourselves, that we need to halve global emissions by 2030, to have a 50/50 chance of hitting net zero midcentury and keeping an average global temperature rise no higher than 1.5C. Without finance shifting, we won’t make it. It is a massive topic, and there a lot of numbers out there. But the world is getting better at unravelling this substantial jigsaw puzzle in terms of climate finance flows within countries and between them. One good source, that does a good job at simplifying the numbers of government and perhaps more importantly private sector flows, is the Global Landscape of Finance by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) It estimates that climate finance reached almost $1.3 trillion in the period 2021/2022, the last date we have. At the time of the Paris Agreement of 2015, it stood at around $ 570 billion, so you could note that it has more than doubled since nations all agreed to act together. Yet, and perhaps this is important, it is only currently around 1 per cent of global GDP. It also masks the fact that most of this money is being spent on two key sectors---both renewable energy and energy efficiency, and the electrification of transport. This current figure is also heavily skewed towards investments in richer countries in Europe and North America plus a relatively small number of big emerging economies like China, Brazil and some parts of Africa. Investment in other key sectors is much lower—think transitioning to smart, regenerative agriculture, forestry, other infrastructure, waste management, natural or nature-based systems and adapting to climate impacts. That is the best guess on the current state of play. Perhaps more importantly perhaps is what is actually needed to spare the world and its people from dangerous climate change over the coming years? What finance flows are needed to keep at or below the key safety target of 1.5C target? The International Energy Agency estimates $4.5 trillion a year by 2030 for clean energy investments alone—a big slice of that is needed in developing or poorer countries. Remember, climate change will not be solved by simply rich countries doing the right thing domestically, we need to help the poorer countries do their bit—a finance issue again. Of course, clean energy is just part of the finance landscape, albeit a big part. To cover all sectors beyond just energy, will require climate finance flows increasing from the current £1.3 trillion a year to $8 to 9 trillion up to 2030, according to the Climate Policy Initiative authors. And then the flows need to jump perhaps as high as over $12 trillion a year from 2031 to 2050—the 2050 date being when the world needs to be what they call net zero. Think of net zero as the point when we have restored the balance, where the emissions we produce into the atmosphere are down so low, a restored natural world of forests and other nature-based systems can absorb the pollution as it did in the past. The sums involved sound big. But remember investments in energy, transport and infrastructure and agriculture and so on will be happening anyway. It is a question of an additional, extra cost, to make those investments work for climate action, to help decarbonize our global economy. How much is this extra cost then, above and beyond what you might call business and usual investment flows? The consultancy McKinsey, writing for the World Economic Forum, estimates that $3.5 trillion of the bigger sums suggested will be extra money to climate proof the global economy. So, to deal with climate change might be not as high as it looks on first glance, something like 3 per cent of GDP perhaps. There is an alternative. We don’t invest in decarbonization across all sectors in all parts of the globe, in other words we sit back, go play golf and have permanent wild parties watching the sun set. Setting aside the suffering and misery that uncontrolled climate change would cause, the best economics indicate not investing in climate action would also be economic shot in the foot. The Climate Policy Initiative report says: “The longer we delay meeting total climate investment needs, the higher the costs will be both to mitigate global temperature rise and to deal with impacts”. They compare carrying on as we are with acting to keep the temperature rise no higher than 1.5C. “Although climate investment needs are large, the amount required is a fraction of the estimated losses….from direct impacts of increased weather-related and other uninsurable damages, increased production costs, productivity losses and health costs”. To move the needle fast, given we have just 6 years before 2030, we will need increases in government finance including to a variety of international sources. Ones like the Green Climate Fund, the Global Environment Facility, government overseas development aid and the various small funds managed by the UNFCCC like the adaptation fund. But this will never be enough—governments struggled to meet a target of giving poor countries $100 billion in climate support pledged at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009. Some think it was only, finally met, by last year’s UN climate conference in Dubai after 13 years—but this is more a political success than a finance mobilization one. No, what we need is private sector finance to step up big time, not for charitable reasons, but because it is in everyone’s self-interest—let the temperature soar and many will find their business models under stress and perhaps in danger of collapse. Unfortunately, there appears to be a collective schizophrenia here among far too many banks, equity funds and others able to make a difference. Not least when it comes to funding or not funding the very substances that are causing much of the problem: the fossil fuel companies. On May 13th, the latest report in a series called Banking on Climate Chaos will be released by a group of NGOs. We don’t have the new numbers. But last year’s shows that since the Paris Agreement, the world’s biggest 60 banks have poured over $5.5 trillion into the big oil companies, fueling expansion. These include both private and government fossil fuel companies like Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Total Energies, Conoco Phiilips and BP and Saudi Aramco and China Petrochemical. The general consensus is that the fossil fuel industry should at the very minimum be not bringing new coal, and oil and gas on stream. A point repeatedly made by the International Energy Agency in their reports on hitting net zero by 2050. And if we are to meet the safety goals of the Paris Agreement fossil fuel companies should be going beyond that by having pathways to decarbonize their operations and supply chains. The main funders, according to the Banking on Chaos Report last year were US banks like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Morgan Stanley. But there are also European banks in the mix, like BNParibas, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and Scotiabank. So, what is going on given that many of these banks say they support the Paris Agreement and some are members of something called the Net Zero Banking Alliance. Insiders say these banks think tighter government regulation will come, so they want to support as much fossil fuel expansion as possible—and make a lot of money-- before that happens. They are happy it seems to lock the world into more fossil fuel infrastructure in the name of profit, even if that infrastructure leads to more climate change and may soon be stranded—another definition of madness! I asked if the report’s authors if they would be happy for a bank to support a We Don’t Have Time broadcast on the topic and the named only one-- La Banque Postale in France. I checked: Their portfolio of fossil fuel investments has declined sharply, and according to independent certifiers, they are on track to meet their target of fully exiting fossil fuels by 2030—magnifique, but just one out of a long list. Fortunately, La Banque Postale is not a person or investor’s only choice if they care about climate change. A new report out this week by the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty with the Global Alliance for Banking on Values, who were regular guests on our shows from COP29 in Dubai, has 17 banks calling for a fossil fuel phase out including Ekobanken in Sweden and Merkur Cooperative Bank in Denmark plus some American banks. So, we do have choices about where we bank—we can move the money away from the masters of the universe to the fathers and mothers of a better future! There is some good news—funding for coal by banks seems to be declining generally, except perhaps for Chinese banks. Insurance companies are also part of the story. Despite many being crucially aware of the risks to their business from growing numbers of extreme weather events, many are still underwriting fossil fuel expansion. Many are at the same time becoming ever more risk adverse to underwrite property insurance amid concerns of climate fueled extreme weather events. Yet they are still part of the ecosystem that keeps the oil pumping busy. Again, surely some cognitive dissonance here. Finally let me talk about equity funds briefly. Influence Map is a research organization out of London. Their last report on funds looked at 593 equity funds with over $265 billion in total net assets classed as Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) funds. They found that over 70 per cent were not aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement. They also looked at 130 funds theme as climate funds—55 per cent were not aligned with the Paris goals. Companies in the funds regularly popping up include Exxon Mobil, TotalEnergies, Kinder Morgan, Halliburton and Chevron. Without Influence Map, many casual investors in such funds managed by familiar names like Black Rock or UBS, would think they are doing good—but they are not, one might say they are even being duped. If you want to know more, check out We Don’t Have Time’s broadcast from a recent NYC Climate Week where we featured these findings and discussed it with experts—it was good TV. Ladies and gentlemen, let me conclude. The coming 1 to 2 years is going to be potentially a key window in the history of humanity. At the last UN climate conference in Dubai, where we were broadcasting daily for close to 12 days, governments kicked started the process to revise upwards their collective national climate plans. The plans will, for the first time, include all sectors of the economy and finance is going to be a hot topic. This process will begin in Bonn, Germany, the HQ of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in June when governments meet and will pass through the next UN annual climate conference in Baku in November and culminate in Brazil in 2025 at COP30. Indeed, the finance debate has already started. Last week at the World Bank-International Monetary Fund’s Spring meeting a group of countries led by Barbados, France and Kenya, stepped up the push of what is called the International Tax Task Force. The aim is creating new levies on fossil fuel producers and sectors like aviation and shipping plus a levy on international financial transactions. The aim is to support the generation of up to $2.4 trillion to support low income and emerging countries fight climate change. In parallel, Brazil is lobbying for support under the G20 for a 2 per cent minimum wealth tax on the world’s billionaires. We Don’t Have Time will certainly try to bring the debate to a global audience with broadcasting in June from the UNFCCC, through NYC Climate Week at COP29 in Baku. If you think this is important, you can support our work and even be guests on our programmes if you want to contribute to the discussions and influence opinion. So let me conclude, the money is moving but not as fast as the science says we need. Governments have only so much money to support both domestic climate action and poorer countries who need support to meet their climate plans including adapting to the impacts many are already experiencing. It is beyond this short snap shot to cover all the solutions. But it is clear governments, who have signed up to all the climate science reports on the risks we are running and committed under the Paris Agreement to hold a temperature rise to no higher than 1.5C, need to exercise their policy powers. They need to regulate whether it be on banking regulations, and they need to remove the trillions of dollars of public subsidies propping up the fossil fuel industry. They also need to urgently ensure that there is transparency in the area of investment funds too so investors can make real choices. Perhaps new measures, like the EU’s directive on corporate sustainability reporting will help—let’s see. But overall progressive investors in equity funds or people with money in banks, need to stand up and be counted to ensure that their money is working for the future, rather than trapping us in the past with all the chilling consequences for every man, woman and child. It is time to move the money!
•
1 d
The company I work for GEMM Masterplanning uses engineering and creative financing to help commercial building owners reduce their carbon footprint. Usually the savings in energy costs more than pay for the finance costs so the transition is cash positive for the building owner. We improve the efficiency of the building add renewable energy, energy storage and backup power as well as equipment to improve the indoor air quality. We increase the value of the buildings we work on. www.gemmasterplanning.com
•
•
•
3 d
Looking forward to hearing from speakers that We Don't Have Time will bring in the programs for discussion,debate, to the whole global audience in June,etc, their voices will influence important opinions. It's that time to #MoveTheMoney.
•
3 d
Fantastic read Nick! Thank you 🙏
Sarah Chabane
4 d
•
Ahead of Earth Day, the Museum for the United Nations unveiled "Sounds Right," a global music initiative celebrating nature's contribution to music while generating vital conservation funding from her own sounds. This initiative aims to spark a global conversation about nature's value and empower millions to protect our planet. For centuries, nature's symphony has inspired artists, but now it’s her turn to take centre stage. Dubbed "NATURE," she's officially recognized as an artist with her own profile on major streaming platforms like Spotify. Fans fund conservation and restoration projects globally by enjoying music featuring natural sounds. Acclaimed artists from around the world have embraced Sounds Right. From Brian Eno, Ellie Goulding, to Bomba Estereo, MØ and David Bowie, they're infusing their tracks with nature's sounds. Each composition offers a unique glimpse into different ecosystems, weaving together music and nature to inspire action. Sounds Right aims to unite artists, environmentalists, and listeners and seeks to ignite a global conversation about nature's intrinsic value and inspire meaningful action to protect it. Through royalties and donations, Sounds Right aims to empower nature, reminding us that we're all part of the same symphony. 🎼🎶 Listen to the Feat Nature playlist: https://open.spotify.com/playlist/38ABjTam1XalavZAhxZyFt?si=a8205c9562af4399&nd=1&dlsi=432706bdefeb430c https://open.spotify.com/user/316cnprjdhyrzdm4rrd3thxhpyam
27 more agrees trigger social media ads
•
•
1 d
Music to the ears , definitely sounds right!
•
•
4 d
Music reaches our subconscious mind, where we still live in lap of nature.
•
•
4 d
This is indeed a creative and impactful way to celebrate Earth Day.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Marine Stephan
4 d
•
If you're following French influencers on social media, you might have already seen in your feed this influencer trip organized by Ultra Premium Direct –a French company that does food for dogs and cats. Some French influencers are currently on Reunion Island carrying out different activities such as bringing stray dogs and cats back to mainland France for adoption, a clean walk at Piton de la Fournaise, a coral cutting operation, and an operation to release "Barau Petrels" (a species of bird) into the wild. Sounds pretty great, doesn't it? Well, yes. Except that... it isn't. It isn't because Ultra Premium Direct is flying a bunch of influencers to the other side of the world –we're talking about an 11-hour flight- to... carry out actions to protect the environment. It is pretty incoherent, and if you compare the (positive) impact of their actions on the ground with the (negative) impact of their trip, I'm not really sure it balances out. Especially when you take into account that some of these influencers care very little (or not at all) about the environment as they usually collaborate with fast fashion brands and promote unsustainable consumption and lifestyle patterns. I am just wondering something: why not organize this trip in mainland France? There are also places impacted by human activities to restore and protect, and local associations to promote. And guess what? You don't even have to take the plane to get there! Just a bold idea for Ultra Premium Direct: maybe try to do impact studies (and coherence studies as well) of your marketing campaigns before implementing them. Thanks to Paye ton Influence for highlighting this issue: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/amdlc_cohaezrence-activity-7188115434968162304-VmFs?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
138 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
1 d
Very hypocritical of them ,lets do all them out for this pronounced fraud!
•
•
4 d
This does not really add up.It sounds more of a publicity staunt than actual action.Climate influencers should walk the talk
•
•
4 d
Some deep level of rethinking is missing from all this. I wonder sometimes, if all this is part of a publicity stunt and not any actual motivation to work for the environment.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
winnie nguru
1 w
•
Sweden is working out a plan to help India to implement Article Six of the Paris Agreement to meet its net-zero emissions target before 2070 by collaborating in the heavy industries sector, mainly steel and cement, Swedish official indicated. The Paris agreement, Article 6 sets out how countries can pursue voluntary cooperation to reach their climate targets. It enables international cooperation to tackle climate change and unlock financial support for developing countries. Under Article Six, countries can transfer carbon credits earned from reducing greenhouse gas emissions to help one or more countries meet their climate targets https://www.livemint.com/news/sweden-set-to-help-india-in-energy-transition-11713347350505.html
78 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
4 d
It's great to see global solidarity in action.
•
•
1 w
It's great to see countries like Sweden stepping up to help India in its energy transition & implementing the Paris Agreement! Good work!
•
•
1 w
This will be a very great way to collaborate ,the timelines are quite unfortunate though. If they are to be honest,the targets need to be brought closer to feel genuine.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Landfills have emerged as a significant contributor to methane pollution, ranking as the third-largest source in the US. With the launch of MethaneSAT and similar satellites, detecting methane emissions from space has become more accessible. This technology provides crucial data to scientists, policymakers, and the public, highlighting the urgency of addressing methane emissions to mitigate the impacts of the climate crisis. It underscores the collective responsibility to curb methane pollution, emphasizing the need for proactive measures to combat global warming and reduce waste. Read more on 👇 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/09/methane-pollution-organic-waste-landfills
146 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
2 w
This is a wake-up call! Landfills are bigger methane culprits than I thought. Those new methane-detecting satellites are a game changer for tracking emissions.
•
•
2 w
Landfills are such a manace for many countries across the world and the danger to our mother planet continues to grow big due to Large emissions of mathane coming from them.MethaneSat will do good in identifying and reducing methane gas
•
•
2 w
With the advancement of technologies like MethaneSAT, we now have a powerful tool to monitor and combat these emissions more effectively.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Kevin
1 w
•
The Scottish government is to ditch its flagship target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030. The final goal of reaching "net-zero" by 2045 will remain, but BBC Scotland News understands the government's annual climate targets could also go. Ministers have missed eight of the last 12 annual targets and have been told that reaching the 75% milestone by the end of the decade is unachievable. A statement is expected at Holyrood on Thursday afternoon. The Climate Change Committee (CCC) - which provides independent advice to ministers - warned back in 2022 that Scotland had lost its lead over the rest of the UK in tackling the issue. Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon saw her SNP administration as world leaders on climate change when the targets were introduced in 2019, often asserting that Scotland had the "most stretching targets in the world." Hers was the first government in the world to declare a climate emergency and Glasgow hosted the COP26 climate summit in 2021, yet environmentalists believe the emergency response never came. With the closure of Scotland's last coal-fired power station at Longannet in 2016, politicians conceded that the low-hanging fruit had all been picked and any future progress would require big changes to how we live our lives. But the Greens believe the current system has fundamentally failed with too much emphasis placed on targets rather than policies. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-68841141?xtor=AL-72-%5Bpartner%5D-%5Bbbc.news.twitter%5D-%5Bheadline%5D-%5Bnews%5D-%5Bbizdev%5D-%5Bisapi%5D&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_campaign_type=owned&at_link_type=web_link&at_bbc_team=editorial&at_medium=social&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_id=668CF092-FCE2-11EE-AC43-EE2B45BDBE88&at_format=link&at_link_origin=BBCWorld
74 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
1 d
As an Snp and Greens activist we are heart broken about our climate failures despite planning the largest new windfarm. Plastic and BigOil are tricky customers. We will get back on course ASAP. Brexit+Tory party continue to damage Scotland.
•
•
1 w
The Scottish government must work to reach the climate target immediately since tomorrow is late and the world is burning of climate disasters. It's time to prioritize mother earth
•
•
1 w
The Scottish government should really focus on reducing gas emissions like other nations so as to achieve our climate goal as a whole.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Earthbanc
5 d
•
🌍🌱 Happy Earth Day! At Earthbanc, we're committed to making a difference in the fight against plastic pollution. This year's theme "Planet vs. Plastic" resonates deeply with our mission. 💡 Did you know? We support tree planting and regenerative agroforestry projects with MRV software abs market linkages for circular bioeconomy agricultural and horticultural produce. We actively try to progress the elimination of single use plastics within our operations and projects that we support. 🌳 Our aim is clear: a healthier planet for generations to come. Join us in taking action this Earth Day! Together, we can turn the tide against plastic pollution and create a more sustainable future. 💚 Know more about at https://earthbanc.io/ #planetvsplastic #Earthday2024 #Earthday #Earthbanc #Sustainability #EcosystemRestoration #netzero #regenerativeagriculture #agroforestry
•
•
3 d
every day should be earth day
•
•
5 d
Happy Earth Day
•
•
4 d
happy earth day
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Ted Weber
5 d
•
Happy Earth Day, everyone! Let's do our best to take care of our only home.
•
•
1 d
Happy Earth Day !
•
•
5 d
Happy Earth Day! Thanks for doing your part 💪
•
•
4 d
happy earth day
Sarah Chabane
5 d
•
Seventeen prominent banks from the Global Alliance for Banking on Values (GABV), including the well-known Triodos Bank, have thrown their support behind the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty initiative. This global initiative aims to accelerate the transition to renewable energy and curb the expansion of coal, oil, and gas production. It's no news that the banking sector, a key player in global finance, has tremendous power when shaping climate action (or more often inaction). And despite previous commitments, banks have continued to invest trillions into fossil fuel industries. By endorsing the treaty, these banks commit to fostering a cleaner, more sustainable future and advancing the global agenda for net-zero emissions by 2050. The way to go! 1. Amalgamated Bank (United States) 2. Banca Etica (Italy, Spain) 3. BancoSol (Bolivia) 4. Beneficial State Bank (United States) 5. Centenary Bank (Uganda) 6. Clearwater Credit Union (United States) 7. Climate First Bank (United States) 8. Ekobanken (Sweden) 9. Finca DRC (Democratic Republic of Congo) 10. Merkur Cooperative Bank (Denmark) 11. NMB Bank (Nepal) 12. Summit Credit Union (United States) 13. Sunrise Banks (United States) 14. Triodos Bank (Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Spain, Germany) 15. Unity Trust Bank (United Kingdom) 16. Vancity (Canada) 17. Vdk Bank (Belgium) https://fossilfueltreaty.org/gabv
27 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
•
1 d
Move the money movement gaining traction from financial institutions is an absolute hit! This is going somewhere
•
•
5 d
This represents a significant milestone in the global movement towards reducing reliance on fossil fuels.
•
•
4 d
Support of 17 bank for moving finance in right direction
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Varsa Mahananda
1 w
•
Construction and development is inevitable. We are going to have more and more of that. However, with construction comes carbon dioxide emissions and pollution. Approximately 8% of carbon dioxide emissions come from building material. So imagine having a more climate-friendly way of building things! Fortera Corporation has found a way for making cement with less carbon dioxide emissions that will operate at a large scale. The technology used by the company allows them to intercept the carbon dioxide released during the cement-making process in the kilns and reuse it in making more cement. They are adding the technology to a CalPortland facility in Redding, California, which is one of the largest cement plants in the western United States. Ryan Gilliam, CEO of Fortera says, “Our target is about being a ubiquitous solution that can really work at any plant.” In the initial days, the company will produce cement that reduces carbon emissions by 10% but they will gradually scale up to reduce the emissions by 40-50% and then eventually 70%, depending on the demand. Read more on cement manufacturing company’s journey: https://apnews.com/article/cement-concrete-carbon-emissions-energy-climate-buildings-a01ea5e9962d3f00a98227e06e2b7917?utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_wsXy6KDulPE2wfWjrmBkJmUdc7QFzy8MNIH3wPQzMw_uNg5mr7HAnv6OCA9oSVQpIVpT0Ez9VfixIZmMzHsdOy86SqSXI3-TkCZSG5JzNlHBWcBY&_hsmi=303042037&utm_content=303042037&utm_source=hs_email
69 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
4 d
Very interesting! Cement is one of the most polluting materials out there, we need to change the way it's produced if we want to decarbonise our economies
•
•
1 w
It's inspiring to see companies prioritizing environmental responsibility while meeting the demands of development and construction.
•
•
1 w
All we need is the green technology that will help to reduce the impact of climate change
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Markus Lutteman
1 w
•
•
The European Election is around the corner, but how will European citizens be able to determine which candidates to trust regarding climate policy? Since action speaks louder than words, the best way is to look at how the different members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have voted on climate, energy, and environment during 2019-2024. Thanks to the EU Parliament Scoreboard, it is now easy to get an overview of this matter. BirdLife Europe, Climate Action Network Europe, European Environmental Bureau, Transport & Environment, and WWF European Policy Office have analyzed European Parliament voting records of the last five years to provide citizens with an interactive overview that scores all the national political parties and European Parliamentary Groups based on their voting performance. The EU Parliament Scoreboard looks at the individual voting behaviour of every MEP during the 2019-2024 legislative term and scores them against the voting recommendations of the five European environmental organisations. This provides a measure of each MEPs commitment to environmental sustainability - with the result being a score out of 100. Results are aggregated in the scoreboard for political groups and national parties represented in the European Parliament. Sadly, this in-depth data research reveals that only a minority of MEPs during the 2019 – 2024 mandate acted to protect Europe’s climate, nature and air quality. The good thing is that all European eligible voters can now see this – and choose to vote differently in June. See the scoreboard.
70 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
2 d
Very insightful! Thanks for sharing
•
•
1 w
Wow! This sounds like a great piece of information to have
•
•
1 w
This is a great move, transparency and accountability is the key to success in phasing out fossils fuels.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Markus Lutteman
1 w
•
•
Teresa Ribera, Spain’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge, is a leading candidate to become Spain’s next EU-commissioner. This is great news for the climate. Ribera has a strong track record on climate policy and was one of the most influential policymakers of the EU’s energy and environment during Spain's EU Council presidency in 2023. In a recent interview, Rivera said she would double down on climate action if elected, and promised to work for "green diplomacy" and to make the European Green Deal the basis for greater economic prosperity. Learn more: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/green-deal-2-0-spains-ribera-lays-down-vision-for-next-commission/
62 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
5 d
she demonstrates a holistic understanding of the interconnectedness between environmental sustainability and economic growth.
•
•
1 w
It is heartening to see the leaders to take stand for earth.
•
•
1 w
This is a positive step towards addressing the pressing issue of climate change. By vowing to enhance its efforts, the EU demonstrates leadership in the global fight against environmental challenges, setting an example for others to follow.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
Ted Weber
1 w
•
The Washington Post's "Climate Coach" columnist helps readers navigate climate issues. In a webcast on April 11, he explained how individuals can be “entrepreneurs of norms” in their everyday lives by being a positive example for your family, friends, and neighbors. Watch his talk here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2024/04/11/dear-climate-coach/
Dear Climate Coach
The Post’s climate advice columnist explains how individuals can be “entrepreneurs of norms” in their everyday lives and how solar panels have become more widespread in acceptance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2024/04/11/dear-climate-coach/
80 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
•
•
5 d
By offering guidance on navigating climate issues, the columnist is providing a valuable resource for individuals who want to make a difference.
•
•
1 w
creating awareness of personal responsibility for climate change matters is impressive... it is time for everyone to know that they have an individual responsibility toward curbing climate change. if everyone becomes an entrepreneur of the norm we can win this fight as soon as possible.
•
•
1 w
This is a great initiative by WP to sensitize on matters environment and how best to take charge of it.
Shared by Sarah Chabane
CarbonPath
1 w
•
Hello all We Don't Have Time Users! We are finally able to sell credits to fund the plugging of orphaned and marginal wells direct to users like you using only a credit card! Help us stop methane emissions, a large contributor to global warming today, and help clean up water around the wells. Old orphaned wells can leak methane, benzene and other pollutants into the water table but can't be effectively measured. Please help us today by buying a credit! https://21d48d-2.myshopify.com/products/carbonpath-carbon-credit-token-buy-retire
CarbonPath Carbon Credit Token (Buy/Retire)
CarbonPath and its partners safely and responsibly clean up the most polluting oil and gas well sites. Your contribution will stop methane and CO2 pollution. We take sites like the one sen here and restore it to nature. Our current projects include 42 wells near Denver, Colorado and 2 wells in Eastern Montana.
https://21d48d-2.myshopify.com/products/carbonpath-carbon-credit-token-buy-retire
•
•
5 d
Great nEws!!
Shared by Sarah Chabane
🌊 Reflecting on the incredible experience at the first-ever physical UN Ocean Decade Conference in Barcelona! 🐳 With 1500 delegates and countless more at outside events, the ocean community united in passion and purpose. Now, onto Athens for the next chapter in our ocean journey. But before we dive into the next adventure, let’s pause and soak in the inspiration from Barcelona. 🌟 @artport_mw had the privilege to engage in enriching conversations, sharing ideas, and igniting change for ocean action. From our successful WE ARE OCEAN Satellite Event to thought-provoking discussions, the commitment to our beloved ocean was palpable. One key takeaway? It’s not just about science; it’s about tapping into our emotions to drive real change in ocean health. 🌊 The Ocean Decade Conference reminded us of the power of human psychology and the importance of unity in our efforts. We were honored to stand alongside remarkable individuals like Ken Paul, Principal at Pokiok Associates, and Dr. Tiara Moore, CEO of BIMS Washington DC. 💙 Their wisdom resonated deeply, emphasizing the use of love over fear as a motivator and the integration of traditional knowledge. We also had the privilege of connecting with our Board Member in Tanzania, @shamim__nyanda, and Mariam Swaleh from the @ocean_climateinnovation_hub in Kenya. 🌍 Their insights further fueled our commitment to ocean action. We also had the privilege of connecting with our Board Member in Tanzania, @shamim__nyanda, and Mariam Swaleh from the @ocean_climateinnovation_hub in Kenya. 🌍 Their insights further fueled our commitment to ocean action. The conference introduced innovative tools like the “Ocean Matcher” and featured inspiring speeches from leaders like @antjeboetius and @fondationprincealbert2 of Monaco. As we bid farewell to Barcelona, we carry with us a treasure trove of ideas for collaborative projects through our WE ARE OCEAN Global Program. 🌎 Together, let’s continue to make waves of change for a healthier. 🌊 📸 by @revolvemedia https://oceandecade.org/news/barcelona-statement-identifies-the-priority-areas-of-action-for-the-ocean-decade-in-coming-years/ https://oceandecade.org/news/barcelona-statement-identifies-the-priority-areas-of-action-for-the-ocean-decade-in-coming-years/ 🌊 Organised by @icm.csic 🙏🏼 Endorsed by @unoceandecade @un_ozeandekade_deutschland @ioc_unesco @oceanliteracy_unescoioc #UNOceanDecade #OceanAction #BarcelonaToAthens #ArtForChange #OceanDecade24 @probleu.schools @ceip___el___terreno @positivelab.eu #WeAreOcean_GlobalProgram #OceanProtection 🎨
•
•
6 d
Insightful article on ocean affairs
•
•
1 w
Very interesting read! Sounds like a start of some great work, and I particularly like the focus on getting people engaged as ocean issues pertain to all of us. Thank you for sharing!
•
•
1 w
I like that they talked deeply about human psychology and unity because it's about what we think, want, and do that affects our environment.
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.
•
•
7 h
Thanks for sharing this great piece.
•
•
3 d
This is quite informing...the issue of climate change and possible hazards that are likely to come up is well explained.there's actually alot that we can learn from this.
•
•
20 h
This article does an excellent job of explaining the various types of droughts. I've gained new insights from it! Thank you, Dr. Erlijn!