51 w
•
Give Climate Warning ⚠️ to American Petroleum Institute: Bizarre campaign labels oil as safe energy source of the future | We Don't Have Time
The American Petroleum Institute (API) has just launched an eight figure ad campaign called ”Lights on Energy”. The campaign aims to ensure that oil and gas companies are allowed to burn and extract more oil and fossil gas for decades to come (but forgets to mention that this would slow down the green transition and make it impossible for the world to limit global warming to a manageable level). So, how do you sell such destructiveness to policy-makers and voters? Easy. You label the problem as a solution. Not only does the campaign claim that ”oil and natural gas are vital to our energy future.” It also argues that NOT investing heavily in fossil energy – the major cause of the climate crisis – will ”put America's future at risk”. (Most scientists would argue it's the other way around.) But hang on, it gets even weirder: Contrary to all science, the campaign finally argues that U.S. fossil gas and oil ”can play a key role in supplying the world with cleaner energy.” The whole campaign is based on the false assumption that oil and fossil gas are needed to meet the world's growing energy needs. Well, guess what? It’s not. Despite the horrendous billion-dollar subsidies paid out to the oil, coal, and gas companies, renewables are now the cheapest form of energy in most parts of the world, even in the US. And the costs of installing new wind and solar plants keep dropping. This, of course, is the reason why the fossil fuel industry is spending so much on this utterly bizarre campaign. It is an industry in a state of panic. At COP28 in Dubai, all 200 nations signed an agreement that the world needs to transition away from all fossil fuels. More and more companies, investors, industry sectors and even governments are turning their back on oil, coal and gas. Add to that the cost of premature deaths and health problems related to the burning of fossil fuels, and you have more arguments than you need to swiftly leave the era of fossil fuels behind ASAP. The American Petroleum Institute is short-sighted, greedy, and disconnected from science and reality. It deserves nothing but a BIG Climate Warning! What do you think about the campaign? Learn more about it here: https://lightsonenergy.com
https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/0e876521-91aa-4598-9685-5f21566b0f61
Electricity 2024 – Analysis - IEA
Electricity 2024 - Analysis and key findings. A report by the International Energy Agency.
https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024
Businesses and leaders will listen and reply on We Don't Have Time
•
48 w
Information is power!
•
50 w
We have come a long way already, but need to speed up to reach our new targets!!! The past years have shown an enormous growth in renewable energy production in Germany!!! You know, when we did start activities more than 30 years ago, nobody in our own utility companies took us seriously!!!! Now for a growing number of hours during the past year the renewable power generation has become the leading source of electricity production in Germany!!!
•
•
50 w
@dr_dietrich_bartelt certainly. We need to accelerate green energy growth
•
50 w
@dr_dietrich_bartelt I still think Germany should have waited some years to shut down the nuclear plants and not turn on the old coal power plants. If GHG reduction was in the core mission, that shouldn't have happened.
•
•
•
50 w
This is exactly what I talked about in my #PopTheCork video last year. We are making much more progress than most people know about. See my 10 min video that will give you hope here: https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/407ecd3c-a522-4d47-a3b7-b0032d3ed409?utm_source=url-copy&utm_medium=wdht-web-app-share&utm_campaign=Rentzhog
•
•
50 w
@Rentzhog as true as this is, fact remains we can do more and should definitely do more
•
50 w
This shift away from fossil fuels and towards cleaner sources promises significant environmental benefits in terms of reduced CO2 emissions and air pollution.
•
•
50 w
@george_kariuki hope is all we need to live and fight another day.
•
•
50 w
@george_kariuki it reduces our carbon emissions greatly and this gradual change in energy sources hugely improved our climate
•
•
50 w
This is a positive step towards reducing the significant carbon footprint of the global economy and addressing the impacts of climate change.
•
•
50 w
@gorffly_mokua it is true that we can only reduce our carbon numbers by ensuring the most polluting sectors adopt green energy
•
51 w
Clean energy is the major focus to save our planet.Nice piece
•
•
50 w
@johnte_ndeto Agree! And we should direct our energy and resources towards it!
•
•
50 w
@johnte_ndeto clean energy is the start pin our journey towards liberation of the planet. From fossil fuels to renewable energy
•
51 w
Wow! Talk about exponential change. It’s just becoming more and more obvious that we have the solutions we need. We’re just lacking the political will. Hoping that will change in 2024.
•
•
50 w
@simon_bergbom I completely agree that it's becoming more obvious that we have the solutions we need to address climate change.
•
•
50 w
@simon_bergbom we have the resources and ability. What we lack is the right direction and willingness to make a change in our world
•
•
51 w
Thank you very much Markus for this lengthy and informative article showing that the transition into renewable energy is going faster than the public awareness
•
•
50 w
@Johannes_Luiga I agree.The public ( my self included) sometimes think that most of the time we take more steps backwards than foward.
•
•
51 w
This is such an important report. My biggest fear though is that (as we've seen before), the fossil fuel industry have way more marketing and communication budgets than the IEA, which will likely mean that they will be able to continue with their narrative of "we need to increase fossil fuel production to match the energy demand". And this narrative will likely be the one that reaches the public opinion and the governments. Also, I'm wondering if the IEA in this report takes into account the distribution of this energy. Will it not be likely that the poorest countries and people will face a shortage of clean energy, as the richest ones will "keep it for themselves"?
•
51 w
@marine_stephan Lets hope that the falling costs of clean electricity will make oil and coal fired power plants obsolete. I think thats the consensus, but of course fossil subsidies will keep dirty power in the grids for longer than we really afford.
•
•
50 w
@marine_stephan the way to go around this hurdle is by diversification of funds and by ensuring all countries have the means of production to support production of renewable energy
•
•
51 w
This is if and when we make the right moves in funding clean energy
•
•
51 w
The claim that fossil fuels are necessary for prosperity is becoming more and more ridiculous.
•
•
50 w
@Adam_Wallin these claims are only backed and come from fossil fuel financiers and people who benefit from such fuels
•
50 w
@Adam_Wallin I'll be back https://run-3.pro