Sarah Chabane
135 w
Companies that haven’t set out credible emissions-reduction plans, as determined by a U.N.-backed third party, will be unable to sponsor the event, run workshops and panel discussions, or book exhibition space in areas managed by the U.K. government. Oil companies BP and Shell are particularly targeted by this decision and will have to keep a lower profile during the November conference. To agree on science-based plans for how companies will reduce carbon emissions is seen as a prerequisite for involvement in the event for the U.K. organizers. Something oil companies are lacking. Fossil-fuel companies have sometimes sponsored previous COP meetings, particularly when hosted in their home country which drew criticism from environmental groups. Officials at BP and Shell, which are both listed in London and have a large presence in the U.K., are disappointed at being sidelined at the event. 🤧🤧 The sidelining of the industry is seen as less important to U.S. rivals Exxon and Chevron because of their smaller presence in Britain. https://www.wsj.com/articles/oil-companies-to-be-sidelined-at-u-n-s-climate-conference-11632130201
66 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.
•
134 w
That is a great move and a practical way of delivering a protest. Kudos to the organizers!
•
135 w
Good to draw such a line.