@rudinei_morais
97 w
If you still have a pet politician, you probably haven't learned anything about politics... https://youtube.com/channel/UCjupRejaOOzHKcssD2duogw
98 w
Hello to all friends, in an attempt to expose my ideas to great leadership, and in the absence of a response from them, I decided to create a YouTube channel to spread these ideas and strengthen a new perception in society, because we know what has to change, what we don't usually see are answers that really change the system, my way of thinking is exactly about that, ideas that can change the system and solve issues that we've struggled for years to solve, join my channel, help my messages call more the attention of leaders and change the system! https://youtube.com/channel/UCjupRejaOOzHKcssD2duogw
102 w
In the future we have two possibilities, in the first scenario we have a forecast based on the observation of our current society, the population continues to grow, or at best it remains, but we continue to consume resources at an accelerated pace, the technological evolution of the rich more automation, which eliminates more jobs in production, the poor have fewer jobs, and so the rich get richer and the poor poorer, which increases violence, money becomes fully digital, when a place is hit due to the strong storms caused by the collapse of the climate, communities are left without energy or internet, the community without access to money loots the commerce to avoid starvation, as much as the energy supplied is clean in this future, we have many social and environmental problems, in the scenario 2 we have a forecast based on the anti-problem equation, an agreement made by the UN with the world government as it did with the 2030 agenda, this agreement implements strategies for governments ernos to reduce the world population, adjust the economy as the population decreased, prevent technological advancement by taxing automated companies and benefiting companies with humanized work generating more employment, until reaching the ideal level of inhabitants for the harmonious coexistence of the human being with the environment environment, at this point, the world is reset and our social structure is reorganized, everyone has the right to a hectare of land, everyone has the right to unlimited consumption of what is manufactured and produced by autonomous factories, even if the inhabitants consume exaggeratedly, there is no a strong impact on the environment because there are few inhabitants, the population asks for their products through an application like the recurring purchase from Amazon, which is delivered to their homes through automation, a house with five people, for example, would be entitled to five hectares of land, a very large space for children to scream, play, to do some maintenance at home without waking the neighbor, violating ence decreases because there is no economy, everyone has equal resources and there is no point in committing an assault, wars decrease because the people are one, sharing the same language and the same law, there are no countries, we are one planet, there is no armies because the technological weapons we have are more powerful than any army and enough to defend us from external threats, science advances fast because it is done with enthusiasm by people who like it and do not depend on budget, this is a truly sustainable world. I need contact with leaders to present the most diverse ideas I have. rudineimorais6@gmail.com
60 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
102 w
One of the simple measures that we could adopt to combat global warming is the manufacture of thick styrofoam plates fitted together, creating artificial ice caps and replacing the area of melted glaciers, according to the theory of refraction of light the white color reflects more heat while the black color absorbs more, so with global warming the ice of the poles that has a light color melts and the waters of darker color are left, these waters absorb more heat, which helps to warm the ocean water and melt even more glaciers, for this project we could include it in the budget of the green fund, so that it becomes a small expense shared by each country.
71 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
101 w
Hello, thanks for participating, it certainly requires research, however this type of project is simpler and there is no need to stop the fight against the emission of polluting gases, it could be a reinforcement of the fight against global warming, however I raise some deeper issues in my way of thinking, as the UN has focused a lot on renewable energies and recycling methods, the issue is that a harmonic sustainable environment is not viable while the organizational structure of the human being depends on an economy, because the economy depends on consumption and population growth, while man's harmony with the environment depends on reducing consumption. See some more ideas on my profile, thanks.
•
•
•
102 w
The idea of artificial ice caps is extremely viable. However a material other than styrofoam should be used, as it's not an environmentally friendly substance.
•
101 w
Rather than creating any material, just sprayers readily available - as we do for ozonization, cold storage, freezing gas point, are viable options. Why focus on melting point, focus on freezing point, we need to freeze the melting ice caps. When it does not rain, and geographies are subject to hydrological and meteorological drought, we create artificial rains to trickle the cycle, why not the same principle be applied. No need for creation of artificial material or replacement. Just freeze those ice caps, with cold storage gases and fumigation.Fumigate to freeze should be the deploy mantra.
102 w
Corruption is a way of wasting raw material unnecessarily. From my observations I saw some unnecessary works being done, I realized that the paving is fragile and has a rough and expensive process, so heavy vehicles pass through the site wearing down the pavement, the asphalt softens with the strong heat and heavy vehicles leave marks that wear away the asphalt precociously, creating holes, the holes are covered in a more fragile way that soon opens up again, this creates constant expenses that do not solve the problem, so, when the city decides to invest more heavily, they scrape the entire asphalted area to be renovated and redo all of it, however they work with heavy machines and compactors that burst the water pipes that pass below the area, so when the asphalt is ready the water utility needs to open the asphalt to change the damaged pipes and the asphalt goes back to being patched, this creates a vicious cycle that opens space even for over-invoicing budgets, so that contractors perceive the opportunity to and constant works. Our asphalt and plumbing technology may be obsolete, and I propose studies to find new solutions, a possible solution would be to create a box along the pipeline, a box that has covers, and these covers would facilitate access for the maintenance of water pipes without need to excavate or have large crews with heavy machinery. The cover should be white, as well as the new asphalt technology, because white reflects more infrared rays, so that it is possible to help cool the Earth while we work to improve it, this replacement would be done gradually as each municipality invests in asphalt reform, so that it does not impact the budget of each government, regarding the technology that would replace the current asphalt, we can use low-density, fire-resistant polyethylene as an example, but obviously it is just a guess and requires studies and research to choose the ideal material.
40 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
•
7 w
Good post! I have the same opinion as you about focusing and developing https://wordleunlimited.io
•
101 w
Nicely putforth, a quick question are not asphalt the future proofing material rather than concrete or cement. why replace the current asphalt. Raw material washing is obsolete its the resource uptake and recovery that's making the difference. No uniform materiality that is reason for backlash
102 w
Today I hear a lot about economic equality, but economic equality is just a fantasy, there will always be rich and poor, because the economy needs both to function, and if you take any figure out of the picture, the economy will certainly stop, because in the current economy, even if everyone started from scratch, earning the same thing, through different ways of thinking and human behavior, some would save, others would spend, and others would borrow, and again the economy would go back to what we know, so equality with the economy as we know it is just a fantasy, it needs to be deleted so that we can be reborn. That's why I invented the anti-problem equation, a set of government measures that adjusts the economy while reducing population numbers, until reaching the ideal scenario to reset the economy, and have a completely sustainable society without imbalance.
•
101 w
The rich will be rich, poor will be poor, its the middle clinch who faces the crunch. Anti problem equation should also include border adjustment and assigned adjustment units as your ethos of share on economic equality is from global perspective and recession and recovery attribute have no lineage with population, its with the job market, the earning the GDP be it of house or of a country. The dynamics of economic equality lies in job markets not on population from my point of perspective. More population more workforce to work and more the GDP....only issue is since we live in a resource constraint economy, tracking and tapping especially the approach of our usage shapes equality.
102 w
The economy works on the basis of consumption and population growth, as long as there is an economy as we know it, we cannot create a society without real environmental impacts, as the reduction of environmental impacts depends on less production, while economic development depends on more production, both topics economy and sustainability end up confronting and contradicting each other, so the definitive solution is to reduce the population with a worldwide birth control, and with the adequate number of inhabitants to implement complete automation of society, not needing manual labor, and distributing resources equally to all, distributing territory equally to all, with fewer inhabitants and complete automation there would be no need for labor, there would be no need for remuneration, there would be no need for an economy to exist, with equal resources for all and without an economy not there would be robberies, with more space for the inhabitants, less friction between neighbors, this ideal number of inhabitants would form a single people, sharing a single language and the same laws for all, a single society, without dispute over territories, politics or resources, there would be no wars, here is a perfect world, where man and the environment coexist in harmony, where people are happy to have time and resources, and work only with what they like.
102 w
Today people unite in a cause, to ensure the future of the planet, however, creative and technological solutions are emerging at every moment, but it is wrong, the approach to how we are dealing with this issue is wrong, we need to follow a logical line of reasoning more efficient, while everyone puts their energies and intellect to solve climate problems, they don't realize what actually causes our problems, the economic and political system are our organizational structures, they are what build our societies, and it is to them that we owe our energies and intellect solving your problems, we will solve the environmental problems, because all the environmental impact is caused by consumption, and the excess of inhabitants consuming, and the economy to turn needs consumption and growth, so I come to you to present solutions to solve problems that reflect on our environment, today companies overprice budgets, politics can be corrupt and even While science can be bought, by solving this, we will solve excessive and unnecessary production. I do not believe in sustainability and economic equality with our current organization, if we want to solve this we will have to reinvent ourselves, I believe that the solution to sustainability is the harmony of man with the environment and not the infinite recycling solutions, trying to build an environment sustainable is trying to build an environment with little consumption to impact the environment less, however, doing this with an economic system that works in the opposite direction and needs consumption is contradictory, I have a very clear vision of a new world, where it is completely automated and economy free, this new world would solve problems like wars, inequality, hunger, and environmental problems, I just need to get the attention of great leaders, because I have many answers.
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.