@patrick_kiash
•
•
Patrick Kiash
1 w
•
•
Last week, Kilifi witnessed a remarkable convergence of art, advocacy, and community engagement during the transformative Kilifi Earth Week event. Organized collaboratively by We Don’t Have Time, CHALI Foundation, One Wall, Poetry After Lunch, and a host of passionate individuals, this initiative aimed to raise awareness about pressing environmental issues and inspire action through creative expression and education. The event saw the creation of three impactful murals strategically placed across Kilifi, serving as poignant reminders of the urgent need to address climate change and preserve our natural ecosystems. These vibrant artworks, adorned with messages of hope and stewardship, are a testament to the collective efforts of both young and old artists who dedicated their time and talent to the cause. In addition to mural painting, Kilifi Earth Week catalyzed a movement of beach clean-ups, laying the foundation for regular community-led initiatives to restore coastal ecosystems. These efforts not only contribute to cleaner beaches but also hold the promise of revitalizing marine life, ensuring a sustainable future for fishermen and locals who depend on these resources for food and livelihoods. Moreover, the event showcased a commitment to tree planting, with over 500 trees collected from the county nursery and more than half successfully planted. This reforestation effort not only enhances biodiversity but also mitigates the impacts of climate change, fostering resilience in the face of environmental challenges. Central to the event's success was the active participation of children, recognized as the "Future Voices" of environmental stewardship. Through engaging activities and educational sessions, they learned about conservation and responsible living, laying the groundwork for a generation of eco-conscious leaders who will carry forward the lessons learned during Kilifi Earth Week. The strategic placement of murals at locations like the Kilifi Kenya National Library ensures that the message of environmental stewardship reaches a wide audience, with between 100 to 150 people visiting the library daily. This positioning ensures maximum visibility and impact, amplifying the reach and effectiveness of the artworks in inspiring action and raising awareness. Amidst the activities of Kilifi Earth Week, we also made two visits to a local radio station to inform the public and invite them to join our cause. Over the course of the event, more than 250 individuals joined in, becoming part of the collective activism and contributing to the momentum of change. Kilifi Earth Week serves as a powerful reminder of the potential for collective action and creative expression to drive positive change in addressing global challenges. By harnessing the talents and passion of artists, engaging communities, and empowering future generations, this initiative paves the way for a more sustainable and resilient tomorrow. As the murals continue to inspire and educate, the legacy of Kilifi Earth Week endures, guiding us towards a brighter and greener future for generations to come. Amidst the activities of Kilifi Earth Week, the region experienced both sunshine and rain, a reminder of the unpredictable nature of weather patterns exacerbated by climate change. Across the country, heavy rains have led to floods, highlighting the urgent need for concerted efforts to mitigate and adapt to the impacts of climate change. In the pursuit of a more sustainable future, organizations like We Don't Have Time are instrumental in bringing about change and influencing society for better, more conscious, and eco-friendly living. Their presence and advocacy serve as catalysts for greater awareness and action, inspiring individuals and communities to embrace environmentally responsible practices and advocate for systemic change.
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Just launched: Four girls. Two possible scenarios from Earth4All . How will their lives unfold? How do our decisions impact their future? A brand new interactive storybook brings to life the stories of four girls from across the world and explores how their lives might unfold under the two Earth4All scenarios. How will they grow up if we stay on our current path of business as usual? What do their futures hold if we take a Giant Leap? It includes a writing competition encouraging young people to share their future visions.
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Last Monday, April 22nd, representatives of frontline communities from Mexico, Brazil, Liberia, the United States and the Czech Republic, facilitated by BankTrack and ING Fossielvrij, demanded at the AGM of that the bank stop treating their territories as a sacrifice zone. Before the AGM started, representatives from affected communities held speeches outside the venue, telling their stories to Dutch activists, and chanting “We are not your sacrifice zone” and “We believe that we will win” together. While Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) mobilised 120 volunteers to attend the AGM, Extinction Rebellion Netherlands blockaded the road entrance to the AGM venue shortly after the opening of the doors, preventing “regular” (non-activist) shareholders from attending the meeting in person. Extinction Rebellion Netherlands blockades the entrances to the AGM venue. Photo: BankTrack As a result, nearly only climate activists were present in the in-person AGM, and almost all the questions asked were about community impacts, human rights violations, biodiversity impacts and the climate crisis. In a telling, although isolated, moment, the chairman of the meeting - Karl Guha - was booed for stating “we can do without the narrative” in response to a personal testimony from a human rights defender from Mexico. ING under fire for fossil steel financing, CEO calls for an EU-wide phase out of coke ovens Frontline communities challenged finance for specific fossil steel clients of ING, like ArcelorMittal and Ternium. Eduardo Mosqueda of Tsikini Mexico, representing the family of a murdered Indigenous anti-mining activist, asked if ING would open an audit into its environmental and social credit facility with steel and mining giant ArcelorMittal. Ana Luisa Queiroz, of PACS Brazil, asked if ING would publicly commit to excluding future finance for the steel company Ternium, and if ING would provide remediation for communities harmed by Ternium’s operations in Rio de Janeiro. John N. Brownell, co-founder of Green Advocates Liberia, asked if ING would commit to not refinance its existing credit facilities with ArcelorMittal, unless the company provided compensation for communities impacted by its mining operations in Liberia. In an evasive response to all three questions, ING stated that it complies fully with international human rights law through its ESR policies. Following a recent report by Reclaim Finance revealing ING to be the third-largest financier of coal-based steel in Europe, Julia Hovenier, Banks and Steel campaigner from BankTrack asked ING if they would strengthen their new steel policy and exclude finance for CCS, and steel companies investing in coal-based expansion. In response, ING’s CEO, Steven van Rijkswijk deflected the bank’s responsibility by responding that the EU must adopt a sunset date for coking coal ovens in Europe, and called on activists to advocate for this at the EU level. “For this I need your help. We need policies, and we’ve made that clear to governments. I’ve also talked to the EU Commissioner in Brussels about this. We need to set standards for the phase out of coking coal ovens at the same time.” said Steven van Rijswijk, CEO of ING. Criticism for US LNG John Beard, from the Port Arthur Community Action Network (PACAN), challenged ING on the bank’s financing for LNG terminals in the US Gulf Coast, including one in his own town of Port Arthur, Texas. ING has directly financed seven LNG terminals in Texas and Louisiana. John explained that LNG terminals add to air and water pollution, causing severe health impacts like increased rates of cancer, and heart, lung and kidney diseases. Citing the disproportionate impact on people of colour and low income communities, he called out the bank’s environmentally racist lending. John also invited the board of ING and other staff to visit the communities in Louisiana and Texas affected by the LNG terminals to see the ‘sacrifice zones’ first hand. In an inadequate response, the CEO referred to ING’s ESR framework and the bank’s due diligence process, and did not commit to visiting the LNG sites. Instead, he urged John to meet with the bank here in the Netherlands. John again took to the microphone to point out that there is already an overcapacity of gas exports to Europe, and ING’s finance for new terminals is not aligned with its net-zero commitments as it incentivises new fracking projects. John ended with: “You can’t decarbonize by recarbonising.” Gas in Europe: EPH Radek Kubala, from Czech organisation Re-Set, asked whether ING would exclude EPH as a client and to close the gaps in their coal policy. Radek represented the StopEPH coalition - a coalition of communities impacted by EPH, a Czech company that revitalised several coal assets divested by other utilities. ING responded that they have already excluded project financing for coal power, completely evading Radek’s point on the need to adopt corporate-level exclusions. On whether ING would exclude EPH as a client, the CEO said: “We do not necessarily exclude clients because they still finance (do) things we do not finance any more”, demonstrating the loophole in their policy. Following this year's AGM, BankTrack will continue to call on ING to act urgently and decisively on their human rights, nature, and climate impacts by facilitating engagement between the bank and frontline communities. Find the original press release here.
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Ingmar Rentzhog
1 w
•
•
Is Your Bank Financing Fossil Fuel Companies? This App Lets You Find Out. Thanks for a great article about We Don't Have Time CleanTechnica! https://cleantechnica.com/2024/04/28/is-your-bank-financing-fossil-fuel-companies-this-app-lets-you-find-out/
Is Your Bank Financing Fossil Fuel Companies? This App Lets You Find Out. - CleanTechnica
We Don't Have Time has created an app that lets you see which banks are investing in fossil fuel expansion or green energy.
https://cleantechnica.com/2024/04/28/is-your-bank-financing-fossil-fuel-companies-this-app-lets-you-find-out/
Patrick Kiash
1 w
•
•
Dear East Africa Community Governments. May it be countries members of East Africa community affected by current situation likeKenya,Tanzania,Uganda,Rwanda Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sundan and all their Meteorological Departments and Agencis. As concerned citizens of this region we must urgently address the pressing issue of climate change and its devastating impacts on our beloved region. Recent events, such as the unprecedented flooding and loss of hundreds of lives in Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi and Uganda happening off late daily and in the past one month and beyond, serve as a stark reminder of the urgent need for action. Climate change is not a distant threat but a present reality, amplifying extreme weather events like the torrential rainfall and subsequent flooding witnessed across East Africa. The consequences are dire, with communities displaced, infrastructure damaged, and lives lost.It is imperative that our governments and meteorological departments collaborate effectively to address this crisis. I call upon you to prioritize climate resilience and adaptation measures, including: Strengthening early warning systems: Enhance meteorological monitoring and forecasting capabilities to provide timely and accurate alerts for extreme weather events. Investing in climate-resilient infrastructure: Implement measures to protect vulnerable communities, including improved drainage systems, flood barriers, and sustainable land-use planning.Promoting community resilience: Empower local communities with the knowledge and resources to mitigate the impacts of climate change, including disaster preparedness and sustainable livelihood practices. Advocating for global climate action: Advocate for ambitious international efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming, ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come.We cannot afford to delay action any longer. The time to act is now. Let us come together as a united front to confront the challenges posed by climate change and safeguard the well-being of our people and planet. Your sincerely and perturbed from this region. Patrick Kiarie. Representing,We don't Have Time-Africa Chapter. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/27/kenya-flood-death-toll-rises-as-more-torrential-rain-forecast https://youtu.be/WwqRFbcgefc?feature=shared
22 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Ingmar Rentzhog
2 w
•
•
Seize the opportunity to become a Climate Reality leader like me. Receive personal training from Al Gore and many other top scientists and experts, free of charge. Apply today! The next training session is scheduled for June 28-30 in Rome. The last time the Climate Reality Project was in Europe was in 2018. I was one of the mentors, and I highly recommend applying. Apply today: https://www.climaterealityproject.org/rome
10 more agrees trigger social media ads
Patrick Kiash
2 w
•
•
The president of Democratic Republic of Congo or his government should highlight and take needed action in the link between illegal logging, corruption, and conflict in the eastern DRC. The goverment of DRC should emphasize its detrimental effects on governance and livelihoods. It underscores how corrupt officials collaborate with loggers, perpetuating a cycle of abuse of public power for private gain. Additionally, the loss of tax revenue worsens the situation, depriving communities of essential resources. Illicit logging not only causes environmental degradation but also contributes to social issues such as human trafficking and child labor. This report calls for concerted efforts to dismantle criminal networks and hold government-embedded actors accountable to address the root causes of the problem. Additionally, the goverment of Congo should inform and warn the Chinese government whose it's people facilitate this illegal trade be success according to the below published report. Kenyan government too and Uganda goverment they should be informed to check all papers in their boarders too about the role of international demand, including from China, in driving the illicit timber trade and exacerbating the problem. I feel all this governments have a responsibility to take action to address these issues, including strengthening law enforcement, implementing regulations to curb illegal logging, and promoting sustainable forestry practices. Below is the link-:) https://adf-magazine.com/2024/04/corruption-in-logging-decimates-drc-forests-to-feed-foreign-markets/?twclid=2-2e7gpev60qx3r3xp1kbrru59
Corruption in Logging Decimates DRC Forests to Feed Foreign Markets - Africa Defense Forum
ADF STAFF A new four-part investigation by the Pulitzer Center Rainforest Investigations Network and The Africa Report shows how trees felled in the Democratic Republic of the Congo make their way across borders with the help of official corruption and a lack of oversight. The report details how mahogany and other species of trees are […]
https://adf-magazine.com/2024/04/corruption-in-logging-decimates-drc-forests-to-feed-foreign-markets/?twclid=2-2e7gpev60qx3r3xp1kbrru59
50 more agrees trigger social media ads
Patrick Kiash
2 w
•
•
World Vision is actively engaging children and young people in the global fight against climate change. Through a research study involving 121 participants from 12 countries, the organization captured their perspectives and desires for action. This approach reflects World Vision's commitment to ensuring children's voices are heard in climate action efforts. The research findings underscore the urgency of the climate crisis and highlight children's and young youths strong desire to be involved in solutions. By amplifying their voices, World Vision aims to inform policymakers and bridge the gap between grassroots activism and policy implementation. https://www.wvi.org/publications/report/climate-change/talk-less-and-act-more-world-needs-help-children-front-and
‘Talk less and act more, the world needs help’: Children front and centre of climate action
https://www.wvi.org/publications/report/climate-change/talk-less-and-act-more-world-needs-help-children-front-and
123 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Ingmar Rentzhog
2 w
•
•
This viral video featuring Benedict Cumberbatch reading a father's apology letter to his children is a must listening to. Benedict captures the madness of our times—"the hardest thing was living through a time when we could have turned this around, but most people just carried on as if it didn't matter." https://youtu.be/yJvczRkQHK0?si=IDp_EctXCIsChykA After the last US election night, which was a very close call, I thought Donald Trump had won. This prompted me to write my own letter to my son. It began: Dear United States of America! I hope I will never have to send this letter to my youngest son. The letter to my son: From those of us who knew what was happening but never changed - This letter is to be opened if you live to the age I was when you were born - You and I. Our birthdays are four days apart. When you read this in the year 2060, I’ll be 81. You’ll be 42. Maybe we’ll both still be alive? Maybe we’ve been trying to survive in a dying world where catastrophes have become the norm. This letter is dedicated to you, and I don’t know how to say this. I’m so sorry. I don’t know what else to say. Because even though I did everything I could, it wasn’t enough. Not enough to give you what we got. A world to stand on. Everyone thought it could be done later. But there was no later. Later is now. And now it’s you! It’s your turn, but there’s nothing left to stand on. No future generations that can pay. You have to pay. And the price. Yes, we already knew what the price was. The price was unthinkably high. A price that can never be paid. When you were born, I looked into your deep blue eyes. Your calm. Your peace and innocence. You entered the world without demands. You came to me full of life, and I stared at you in wonder. So frail. So new. So full of trust. I took you into my arms. Kept you warm. We gazed at each other. That was the strongest experience I’ve ever had. I caught a glimpse of the infinite. I gazed into eternity. Everyone who’d come before and everyone who’ll come after. I felt unconditional love. The divine. The eternal. Everything at once. Yes, I really did experience all that. When I held you in my arms. But you won’t be able to experience any of that. Your generation stopped. You stopped bringing new life into the world because you understood the unfathomable. The debt was too great. The debt was unpayable. No one could manage that burden. You didn’t want to pass the debt on to anyone else. Because you know it can never be paid. Perhaps you blame us for not doing this. .... Read the full version of my letter here: https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/5994f340-283e-41fd-b8c7-d2ce2f37e68f What do you think of our letters? Mine is a version I still hope that I will never need to send. However, given the crazy leaders we have and the absurdity of our society, I'm not so sure anymore. It’s a circus. Just read this Climate Warning about Liz Truss and her plans to cancel the COP26 meeting in Glasgow and to roll back all environmental legislation. It was very close to succeeding. Luckily, she is no longer in power, but there are many more like her, with similar or worse aspirations, all pumped and promoted with money from interests tied to fossil fuels. https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/2d16825b-815d-4fd5-bf2d-c14244632970
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Nick Nuttall
2 w
Remarks by Nick Nuttall, the UN Spokesperson for the Paris Climate Agreement and We Don’t Have Time Presenter at an Event Hosted at the Nordic Pension Fund SPP Stockholm, 22 April 2024--The next UN climate conference in Baku, COP29, is being billed as the finance COP. So how fast and how big are the financial flows right now in terms of financing a transition to a low carbon economy that meets the goals of the landmark Paris Climate Agreement of 2015? Let us remind ourselves, that we need to halve global emissions by 2030, to have a 50/50 chance of hitting net zero midcentury and keeping an average global temperature rise no higher than 1.5C. Without finance shifting, we won’t make it. It is a massive topic, and there a lot of numbers out there. But the world is getting better at unravelling this substantial jigsaw puzzle in terms of climate finance flows within countries and between them. One good source, that does a good job at simplifying the numbers of government and perhaps more importantly private sector flows, is the Global Landscape of Finance by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) It estimates that climate finance reached almost $1.3 trillion in the period 2021/2022, the last date we have. At the time of the Paris Agreement of 2015, it stood at around $ 570 billion, so you could note that it has more than doubled since nations all agreed to act together. Yet, and perhaps this is important, it is only currently around 1 per cent of global GDP. It also masks the fact that most of this money is being spent on two key sectors---both renewable energy and energy efficiency, and the electrification of transport. This current figure is also heavily skewed towards investments in richer countries in Europe and North America plus a relatively small number of big emerging economies like China, Brazil and some parts of Africa. Investment in other key sectors is much lower—think transitioning to smart, regenerative agriculture, forestry, other infrastructure, waste management, natural or nature-based systems and adapting to climate impacts. That is the best guess on the current state of play. Perhaps more importantly perhaps is what is actually needed to spare the world and its people from dangerous climate change over the coming years? What finance flows are needed to keep at or below the key safety target of 1.5C target? The International Energy Agency estimates $4.5 trillion a year by 2030 for clean energy investments alone—a big slice of that is needed in developing or poorer countries. Remember, climate change will not be solved by simply rich countries doing the right thing domestically, we need to help the poorer countries do their bit—a finance issue again. Of course, clean energy is just part of the finance landscape, albeit a big part. To cover all sectors beyond just energy, will require climate finance flows increasing from the current £1.3 trillion a year to $8 to 9 trillion up to 2030, according to the Climate Policy Initiative authors. And then the flows need to jump perhaps as high as over $12 trillion a year from 2031 to 2050—the 2050 date being when the world needs to be what they call net zero. Think of net zero as the point when we have restored the balance, where the emissions we produce into the atmosphere are down so low, a restored natural world of forests and other nature-based systems can absorb the pollution as it did in the past. The sums involved sound big. But remember investments in energy, transport and infrastructure and agriculture and so on will be happening anyway. It is a question of an additional, extra cost, to make those investments work for climate action, to help decarbonize our global economy. How much is this extra cost then, above and beyond what you might call business and usual investment flows? The consultancy McKinsey, writing for the World Economic Forum, estimates that $3.5 trillion of the bigger sums suggested will be extra money to climate proof the global economy. So, to deal with climate change might be not as high as it looks on first glance, something like 3 per cent of GDP perhaps. There is an alternative. We don’t invest in decarbonization across all sectors in all parts of the globe, in other words we sit back, go play golf and have permanent wild parties watching the sun set. Setting aside the suffering and misery that uncontrolled climate change would cause, the best economics indicate not investing in climate action would also be economic shot in the foot. The Climate Policy Initiative report says: “The longer we delay meeting total climate investment needs, the higher the costs will be both to mitigate global temperature rise and to deal with impacts”. They compare carrying on as we are with acting to keep the temperature rise no higher than 1.5C. “Although climate investment needs are large, the amount required is a fraction of the estimated losses….from direct impacts of increased weather-related and other uninsurable damages, increased production costs, productivity losses and health costs”. To move the needle fast, given we have just 6 years before 2030, we will need increases in government finance including to a variety of international sources. Ones like the Green Climate Fund, the Global Environment Facility, government overseas development aid and the various small funds managed by the UNFCCC like the adaptation fund. But this will never be enough—governments struggled to meet a target of giving poor countries $100 billion in climate support pledged at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009. Some think it was only, finally met, by last year’s UN climate conference in Dubai after 13 years—but this is more a political success than a finance mobilization one. No, what we need is private sector finance to step up big time, not for charitable reasons, but because it is in everyone’s self-interest—let the temperature soar and many will find their business models under stress and perhaps in danger of collapse. Unfortunately, there appears to be a collective schizophrenia here among far too many banks, equity funds and others able to make a difference. Not least when it comes to funding or not funding the very substances that are causing much of the problem: the fossil fuel companies. On May 13th, the latest report in a series called Banking on Climate Chaos will be released by a group of NGOs. We don’t have the new numbers. But last year’s shows that since the Paris Agreement, the world’s biggest 60 banks have poured over $5.5 trillion into the big oil companies, fueling expansion. These include both private and government fossil fuel companies like Shell, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Total Energies, Conoco Phiilips and BP and Saudi Aramco and China Petrochemical. The general consensus is that the fossil fuel industry should at the very minimum be not bringing new coal, and oil and gas on stream. A point repeatedly made by the International Energy Agency in their reports on hitting net zero by 2050. And if we are to meet the safety goals of the Paris Agreement fossil fuel companies should be going beyond that by having pathways to decarbonize their operations and supply chains. The main funders, according to the Banking on Chaos Report last year were US banks like JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Morgan Stanley. But there are also European banks in the mix, like BNParibas, Barclays, Deutsche Bank and Scotiabank. So, what is going on given that many of these banks say they support the Paris Agreement and some are members of something called the Net Zero Banking Alliance. Insiders say these banks think tighter government regulation will come, so they want to support as much fossil fuel expansion as possible—and make a lot of money-- before that happens. They are happy it seems to lock the world into more fossil fuel infrastructure in the name of profit, even if that infrastructure leads to more climate change and may soon be stranded—another definition of madness! I asked if the report’s authors if they would be happy for a bank to support a We Don’t Have Time broadcast on the topic and the named only one-- La Banque Postale in France. I checked: Their portfolio of fossil fuel investments has declined sharply, and according to independent certifiers, they are on track to meet their target of fully exiting fossil fuels by 2030—magnifique, but just one out of a long list. Fortunately, La Banque Postale is not a person or investor’s only choice if they care about climate change. A new report out this week by the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty with the Global Alliance for Banking on Values, who were regular guests on our shows from COP29 in Dubai, has 17 banks calling for a fossil fuel phase out including Ekobanken in Sweden and Merkur Cooperative Bank in Denmark plus some American banks. So, we do have choices about where we bank—we can move the money away from the masters of the universe to the fathers and mothers of a better future! There is some good news—funding for coal by banks seems to be declining generally, except perhaps for Chinese banks. Insurance companies are also part of the story. Despite many being crucially aware of the risks to their business from growing numbers of extreme weather events, many are still underwriting fossil fuel expansion. Many are at the same time becoming ever more risk adverse to underwrite property insurance amid concerns of climate fueled extreme weather events. Yet they are still part of the ecosystem that keeps the oil pumping busy. Again, surely some cognitive dissonance here. Finally let me talk about equity funds briefly. Influence Map is a research organization out of London. Their last report on funds looked at 593 equity funds with over $265 billion in total net assets classed as Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) funds. They found that over 70 per cent were not aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement. They also looked at 130 funds theme as climate funds—55 per cent were not aligned with the Paris goals. Companies in the funds regularly popping up include Exxon Mobil, TotalEnergies, Kinder Morgan, Halliburton and Chevron. Without Influence Map, many casual investors in such funds managed by familiar names like Black Rock or UBS, would think they are doing good—but they are not, one might say they are even being duped. If you want to know more, check out We Don’t Have Time’s broadcast from a recent NYC Climate Week where we featured these findings and discussed it with experts—it was good TV. Ladies and gentlemen, let me conclude. The coming 1 to 2 years is going to be potentially a key window in the history of humanity. At the last UN climate conference in Dubai, where we were broadcasting daily for close to 12 days, governments kicked started the process to revise upwards their collective national climate plans. The plans will, for the first time, include all sectors of the economy and finance is going to be a hot topic. This process will begin in Bonn, Germany, the HQ of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in June when governments meet and will pass through the next UN annual climate conference in Baku in November and culminate in Brazil in 2025 at COP30. Indeed, the finance debate has already started. Last week at the World Bank-International Monetary Fund’s Spring meeting a group of countries led by Barbados, France and Kenya, stepped up the push of what is called the International Tax Task Force. The aim is creating new levies on fossil fuel producers and sectors like aviation and shipping plus a levy on international financial transactions. The aim is to support the generation of up to $2.4 trillion to support low income and emerging countries fight climate change. In parallel, Brazil is lobbying for support under the G20 for a 2 per cent minimum wealth tax on the world’s billionaires. We Don’t Have Time will certainly try to bring the debate to a global audience with broadcasting in June from the UNFCCC, through NYC Climate Week at COP29 in Baku. If you think this is important, you can support our work and even be guests on our programmes if you want to contribute to the discussions and influence opinion. So let me conclude, the money is moving but not as fast as the science says we need. Governments have only so much money to support both domestic climate action and poorer countries who need support to meet their climate plans including adapting to the impacts many are already experiencing. It is beyond this short snap shot to cover all the solutions. But it is clear governments, who have signed up to all the climate science reports on the risks we are running and committed under the Paris Agreement to hold a temperature rise to no higher than 1.5C, need to exercise their policy powers. They need to regulate whether it be on banking regulations, and they need to remove the trillions of dollars of public subsidies propping up the fossil fuel industry. They also need to urgently ensure that there is transparency in the area of investment funds too so investors can make real choices. Perhaps new measures, like the EU’s directive on corporate sustainability reporting will help—let’s see. But overall progressive investors in equity funds or people with money in banks, need to stand up and be counted to ensure that their money is working for the future, rather than trapping us in the past with all the chilling consequences for every man, woman and child. It is time to move the money!
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Joseph Githinji
2 w
•
Great news from Kenya's National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) who have announced a ban on the use of plastic garbage bags and bin liners. This follows a ban on plastic carrier bags use and manufacturing in 2017, which unfortunately has not been followed religiously. Now NEMA has promised to do a crackdown on the same to ensure this ban is executed Perfectly. "To ensure environmentally sound management of the organic waste fraction, the Authority hereby directs that within 90 days from the date of this notice; All organic waste generated by households, private sector and public sector institutions, religious institutions, private and public functions and events; shall strictly be segregated and placed in 100 per cent biodegradable garbage bags/ bin liners only," the statement read in part. More interestingly all households have been asked to collect organic waste separately and have it transported to a designated Material Recovery Facility for further processing. "The use of conventional plastic bags/bin liners for collection of organic waste shall thus cease forthwith," NEMA directed. To ensure that the directive was implemented nationally, all county governments and private waste service providers licensed by NEMA were required to provide their clients the 100 per cent biodegradable garbage bags/bin liners. Read more: https://www.kenyans.co.ke/news/99969-nema-bans-use-plastic-garbage-bags-and-bin-liners
27 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Patrick Kiash
2 w
•
•
Chris Stark, the head of the Climate Change Committee, sounded an urgent alarm regarding the UK government's stance on climate change. Indeed the leadership of Rishi Sunak should be highly criticized for failing to live to the expectation of many. Stark, statement indeed pin points Sunak's decisions have set the nation back in its fight against climate change, risking its global standing and leaving it trailing behind other countries. He still highlighted delays in critical policy implementations and the watering down of ambitious targets as significant setbacks. He underscored the crucial need for bold and immediate action across multiple sectors to meet the imperative goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. According to Chris, the UK's success in decarbonizing electricity generation, notably through the closure of coal-fired power plants, is commendable but insufficient. Moreover, he called upon political leaders, to demonstrate greater resolve and leadership on climate change. His emphasis is very important and especially cooperation and public engagement in tackling this pressing issue. The climate crisis demands urgent attention and decisive action collectively. In essence, his clarion call for prioritizing climate change mitigation efforts at the highest levels of government and society matters. He highlights the need for a concerted and unwavering commitment to combatting climate change, not just for the sake of the environment, but for the well-being and prosperity of future generations. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-68863796
Chris Stark: Rishi Sunak has set us back, head of climate change watchdog says
In a BBC interview, Chris Stark says the PM has not made climate change "as much of a priority as his predecessors".
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-68863796
45 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Assaad Razzouk
3 w
•
Good climate news this week 1. Swiss women open floodgates to net zero court challenges as top EU rules human rights violated by climate inaction 2. Top India court: right to life includes climate change 3. Brazil in new program to cut deforestation 4. New York sues world’s biggest meat company 5. EVS 50% of China’s new cars sales by 2030 6. EU in new law to cut methane emissions on oil & gas imports 7. Zurich Insurance will no longer underwrite new oil & gas projects Climate anxiety is real and widespread. This thread ⬆️, which has run weekly for more than 4 years, aggregates good climate news to show that climate action and climate justice are widespread - and have momentum. Just keep on clicking for a big dose of good climate news! Follow me on LinkedIn and X to see the full thread of good climate news.
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Simon Bergbom
3 w
•
It's disheartening to see the amount of packaging and plastic waste that comes with orders from Target. I recently received this cleaning spray (pictured below) in a box that could have fitted about ten additional bottles. The box was way too big, and the spray was wrapped in a ton of plastic. According to Target's website, their ambition is to "Innovate to eliminate waste," but after receiving this packing, I'm curious as to what that innovation really entails. I understand the need for protection during shipping, but more sustainable alternatives are available. I urge Target to use its position and purchasing power as one of America's largest brands to help drive innovation and provide new eco-friendly packaging options.
150 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
Patrick Kiash
3 w
•
•
Back late last year We Don't Have Time- Kenya Chapter team had the pleasure of staying at Distant Relatives Ecolodge in Kilifi, when we honored government of Kenya invitation through (KIPPRA) The Kenya Institute for Public Research and Analysis. As they were accelerating Economic growth and fight against climate change in those areas in their 6ths kippra annual regional conference 2023. And through our search online for the right place that we felt we are connecting to with all Eco System in coastal side of Kenya, we noted Distant Relatives fits us! We were thoroughly impressed by their commitment to sustainability and eco-friendliness. And before I forget, upon exploring their website, I was pleased to discover a comprehensive overview of their eco-friendly initiatives and so many things cool related with their daily activities and cool forest full of different types of trees in their spaces and in their vicinity. From renewable energy sources to waste reduction strategies, Distant Relatives is truly dedicated to minimizing their environmental footprint. During our stay, we observed firsthand the efforts made by the lodge to prioritize sustainability. The use of solar power for electricity, composting organic waste, and providing guests with refillable water stations were just a few examples of their eco-conscious practices. And even their toilets are well made perfectly with the mind of ecosystem. And if you are backpackers, rest assured all is sorted for you by their team. It's evident that Distant Relatives Ecolodge is making a positive impact on the environment. By reducing carbon emissions, preserving local ecosystems, and supporting conservation efforts, they are setting a commendable example for sustainable tourism. I was also impressed by the lodge's commitment to community engagement. Through initiatives such as employing local residents and sourcing ingredients from nearby farmers, Distant Relatives is actively contributing to the well-being of the Kilifi community and different diversity tribes from all regions in Kenya and beyond the Kenyans boarders. In overall my impression, and experience at Distant Relatives Ecolodge was nothing short of exceptional. I highly recommend it to fellow travelers who share a passion for sustainability and environmental responsibility. By choosing Distant Relatives, you can enjoy a comfortable stay while supporting a business that truly cares about the planet. Since its establishment in 2010, Distant Relatives has been the proud recipient of numerous prestigious awards. In 2020, for the sixth consecutive year, they were honored to receive the coveted Travelers' Choice Award from TripAdvisor, along with the esteemed Certificate of Excellence. Additionally, they were privileged to be acknowledged as the Best Hostel in Kenya by Hotelworld for the year 2020. Furthermore, in 2021, they were humbled to receive the esteemed Traveler Review Award from booking app, recognizing their commitment to exceptional guest experiences. For me this indicates despite where we are nearer or in distance, we are all one family and planet is only one home we have, hence we say Together we can do it it and Together we are the solutions to the climate crisis, as what the founders of distant relatives noted when they started this project which is a home and cool venue for all of us despite our tribe, gender, sexuality, region, religion, race, etc. Learn more about them here-:) https://www.kilifibackpackers.com/
146 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Ingmar Rentzhog
3 w
•
•
Since the pandemic, air travel in Sweden has seen a decline as citizens increasingly opt for trains, demonstrating a shift towards more sustainable travel habits. Despite this, the Swedish government and the Finance Minister have disproportionately allocated resources, with 1 billion SEK going to the aviation industry, none to railways, and a mere 100 million SEK to other climate solutions. This allocation to aviation, an industry suffering from reduced demand and known for high emissions, is deeply troubling. It reflects a disturbing trend: as Swedes become more eco-conscious, the government paradoxically bolsters fossil fuel interests, stalling necessary industrial adaptation. Such policies seem less like governance and more like corruption. How can the Finance Minister defend these choices? As I happen to be invited to meet the Finance Minister at a breakfast roundtable next week, I will press for answers and advocate for a redirection of funds towards solving the climate crisis. We must move the money into the solutions, not the other way around! We cannot wait any longer. Join the "Move The Money" campaign by We Don't Have Time and learn how to direct your money towards real climate solutions. Together, we can push for the change we need. We have created guides on how your money can be moved to the solutions: https://wedonthavetime.org/movethemoney Source the new spring budget for Sweden (in swedish): https://klimatgranskaren.se/varbudgeten-10-ganger-mer-till-flygplatser-an-till-klimatet/ Source for: Dip for air travel – new norms come into play: https://www.tn.se/naringsliv/25920/dipp-for-flyget-nya-normer-spelar-in/
140 more agrees trigger scaled up advertising
Patrick Kiash
3 w
•
•
DEBT RELIEF FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE: WHY CANCELLING FOSSIL FUEL DEBTS IS VERY ESSENTIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ESPECIALLY TO GLOBAL SOUTH. A new report released on the eve of the meetings found that developing countries will pay a record $400 billion to service external debt this year. It said climate spending could bankrupt developing countries due to huge debt costs and called for debt forgiveness for those most at risk. The report from the Debt Relief for Green and Inclusive Recovery Project (DRGR) warned 47 developing nations would reach external debt insolvency thresholds in the next five years if they invested the necessary amounts to meet the 2030 Agenda and Paris Agreement goals. The World Bank and the IMF, now in their eighth decade of committing to fight poverty, have yet to account for loans that are clearly illegitimate and must be canceled outright, nor for harsh loan conditionality's that have deepened inequality and impoverishment. Hence we are calling out that its time to #MoveTheMoney, https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/movethemoney and by doing so, it will help the global south to move away from this slavery of fossil fuels loans that they have been reservicing for the last EIGHT DECADES. Its the time all should know our choice matters, and the choice to the right path is highly needed like yesterday. Global south don't need to be impoverished forever, they need solutions that can pull them from this deep pit! Read here below the whole report-:) https://www.climatechangenews.com/2024/04/16/fossil-fuel-debts-are-illegitimate-and-must-be-cancelled/
Your choice matters—It's time to Move the money
An easy to follow guide on how to #MoveTheMoney as an individual, as an institutional investor or as a company.
https://app.wedonthavetime.org/frontpage/movethemoney
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Princess
3 w
•
Senoptica Technologies, a sensor technology and analytics company founded in 2018 as a spin-out from Trinity College Dublin, has developed a groundbreaking solution to tackle global food waste. By utilizing optical sensors created with patented food-safe ink, Senoptica measures oxygen levels inside packaged foods, predicting spoilage before it occurs. This technology is particularly vital for foods sold in modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), which comprises half of the world's fresh packaged food. MAP extends shelf life by altering gas composition within packages, reducing oxygen levels to prevent spoilage. However, if packaging is compromised, spoilage can accelerate. Senoptica's sensors, integrated into packaging films, detect oxygen levels, alerting manufacturers and retailers to packaging defects. This enables immediate rejection of out-of-spec packs, preventing spoiled products from reaching consumers. Through handheld scanners and inline scanning systems, Senoptica's technology facilitates real-time monitoring at various points along the supply chain, ensuring food quality and safety. Additionally, by providing insights into gas levels, Senoptica empowers retailers to optimize product turnover, minimizing waste and maximizing revenue.In pilot trials, Senoptica identified significant packaging defects, illustrating the technology's potential to prevent food waste on a large scale. The company's FDA approval marks a milestone, paving the way for expansion into the North American market and further retail trials. Senoptica aims to reduce food waste by 11 million tonnes annually, equivalent to mitigating 240 million tonnes of CO2 emissions. This innovative approach not only addresses environmental concerns but also offers economic benefits to retailers by optimizing operations and enhancing sustainability efforts. With its technology validated and regulatory approval secured, Senoptica is poised to revolutionize food packaging and distribution, making significant strides towards a more sustainable and efficient food industry. https://www.siliconrepublic.com/start-ups/senoptica-us-market-fda-approval-food-waste-packaging-trinity
39 more agrees trigger social media ads
Patrick Kiash
3 w
•
•
The case was brought by a group of older women and their association in Switzerland who alleged that the State was not doing enough to cut greenhouse gas emissions. As a consequence, it was exposing them to life-threatening heatwaves in violation of the right to life and the right to private and family life enshrined in Articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). The applicants also alleged a violation of the right to a fair trial (Article 6) and the right to an effective remedy (Article 13), because the Swiss courts had dismissed their claims on procedural grounds. The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Switzerland had failed to act in time and in an appropriate and consistent manner to devise, develop and implement relevant legislation and measures to mitigate the effects of climate change. Therefore, Switzerland had failed to comply with its positive obligations under the Convention and exceeded its margin of appreciation. This acknowledges that States have the responsibility to combat climate change to protect human rights. At the same time, the Court underlined that States should be accorded a wide margin of appreciation regarding the choice of means adopted in order to meet internationally anchored targets and commitments in the light of priorities and resources. Find out more here-:) https://ennhri.org/news-and-blog/the-grand-chamber-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-issues-groundbreaking-judgment-on-climate-change-and-human-rights/#:~:text=On%209%20April%202024%2C%20the,the%2 https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fennhri.org%2Fnews-and-blog%2Fthe-grand-chamber-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-issues-groundbreaking-judgment-on-climate-change-and-human-rights%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR20feosXRj_Z9JOwEgyJz8FBFcKi_hzKi6-cDZHQ6HlMZtgFauTby711tc_aem_AftkSgIZeqvnExKtCss-uELhAC6IPJndcTT71IJ0BDEBkQARGihmV8vQMSen3WWwLSz50WBz9dX_Csi3qcw-D_yT%23%3A~%3Atext%3DOn%25209%2520April%25202024%252C%2520the%2Cthe%2520effects%2520of%2520climate%2520change&h=AT2KWf3_YUlsgXA0SpDjf4vX0WFIX9Db66ltAWw6A0NgnKr7pMSMbUugVH-1wmbhtxM47_LS7zKgxBVeoyL-b7LtsZ_i-T7uzpesSCcfVbcRrYp_iyqvRr1LeyqrNkGvMrmJ7w
24 more agrees trigger social media ads
Shared by Patrick Kiash
tve.org
8 w
•
Happy Women’s Day 2024 "Till the End" is cinematic masterpiece that not only captures the essence of resilience & determination but also underscores the pivotal role of women in shaping the course of history. The film bagged "Women/Girls in Sustainability Award" at the 12th Global Sustainability Film Awards https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ojXheqWW_M
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Sarah Chabane
7 w
•
On a crisp Saturday morning in March, 60 individuals gathered in a school in the suburbs of Stockholm, embarking on a groundbreaking journey – Sweden's first Citizen Assembly on Climate. This initiative, a part of the research project Fairtrans, aims to stimulate informed public discourse and provide tangible recommendations to address the pressing climate crisis to policymakers. We Don't Have Time was there to document the inaugural meetings of this first-of-its-kind event. Understanding the Citizen Assembly What exactly is a citizen assembly, and why is it happening now? Citizen assemblies are a form of deliberative democracy where randomly selected citizens come together to deliberate on specific and complex societal issues, in this case, climate change. This approach has been gaining traction globally as a means to involve citizens directly in decision-making processes and strengthen democracy. Successful implementations have been seen in countries like Spain, Ireland, Finland, and France. With the urgency of the climate crisis becoming increasingly apparent, and after two years of planning, on March 9 it was now Sweden’s turn to launch its first citizen assembly to explore innovative solutions. “A country in miniature” Ensuring diversity and representation was paramount in the selection process of the 60 assembly members. From an initial pool of 7,000 individuals invited via mail and SMS, 473 expressed interest. The final 60 were chosen with an algorithm, with replacements available. Factors such as political affiliation, level of climate concern, education, and geographic distribution were considered to mirror Sweden's demographic landscape. The final participants represent a microcosm of Swedish society from the southern region of Scania to the northern city of Umeå and from 17 years old to 80. “An honour to be here!” - First Weekend Highlights The inaugural weekend was marked by enthusiasm and engagement, with participants expressing curiosity and a sense of responsibility towards the process. “It’s an honour to be here and represent Sweden’s population and get the opportunity to influence our country’s climate policy.” After an introduction by their mentors Carolina Klüft and Sverker Sörlin, the assembly delved head first into a series of keynote presentations by leading experts in climate science and policy. From climatology to indigenous perspectives, or the role of the private sector, the shared knowledge laid a solid foundation for informed discussions in the months ahead. The Citizen's Assembly had the privilege of hearing from esteemed experts who provided insights into various facets of the climate crisis. Get the chance to watch their keynotes and exclusive interviews here: https://www.wedonthavetime.org/events/climatecitizenassembly The participants were split into smaller groups and engaged in various workshops, including Climate Fresk and reflection sessions. These sessions aimed to encourage togetherness among participants and help each discover their role in the assembly process. "We are all so different here and everyone has something to bring to the discussions from their experience and where they come from in Sweden." Next Steps: Beyond knowledge, empowering change through collective decision-making Following the initial meetings, the assembly will continue its deliberations online, focusing on knowledge creation, workshops, and thematic discussions, notably on transportation a significant contributor to Sweden’s greenhouse gas emissions. With the help of experts, participants will examine alternative transportation modes, infrastructure development, and behavioural changes necessary to transition towards a greener transportation system. These discussions will culminate in the formulation of recommendations to be presented during an in-person meeting in May, where participants will vote on a final proposal. The ultimate goal is to communicate and pass forward this final proposal to policymakers at national, regional, and local levels. "I can't wait to go home and read more about what we discussed this weekend and go on with the process." What outcomes can we expect from the proposal to be taken forward by the Assembly? As Sverker Sörlin aptly said, "It's anyone's guess!" And therein lies the beauty of this democratic experiment. What happens when the people get to express themselves? In any case, I look forward to attending the final meeting in May and reporting to you. / Sarah Chabane, Global Community Manager, We Don't Have Time - March 18th 2024.
Shared by Patrick Kiash
A leaked draft from the European Council lays bare the EU’s strategic agenda for the next five years. We Don’t Have Time can now reveal that the document shockingly downplays Europe’s climate agenda. We Don’t Have Time has obtained a leaked draft of the European Council’s strategic agenda for 2024-2029. Once adopted, this high-level document will define the EU's most important political priorities after the 2024 elections. For anyone concerned about the climate crisis, the leaked document is not a pleasant read. The strategic agenda of the European Union focuses on a number of priorities for the upcoming five years. It also sets out how to achieve those objectives. The current agenda, for 2019-2024, has four main priorities. One of them is: Building a climate-neutral, green, fair and social Europe. This priority has been the driving factor behind the European Green Deal, and a main reason why Europe is considered a world leader in terms of climate action. But this might now drastically change. The leaked draft of the coming five-year agenda clearly shows that climate is not to be considered a main priority of the European Union. The priority headline about a climate-neutral Europe has been deleted, and the word ”climate” is only mentioned twice in the whole document. During a press briefing on the strategic agenda on April 2, Charles Michel, president of the European Council, said: ”By now, we have identified together a set of clear priorities, which converge towards delivering a powerful common goal – a strong, prosperous and democratic Union”. He did not provide any details about the new Agenda's priorities, but the leaked document makes it brutally clear what these new priorities are – and what has been excluded. While the former agenda called for stepping up climate action on multiple levels to ensure that EU policies are consistent with the Paris Agreement, the leaked draft doesn’t mention the need for urgent climate action at all. It says that Europe should ”promote innovation and research, including in the field of defence and to accompany Europe towards climate neutrality”. It also notes that Europe should ”prepare for the new realities stemming from climate change.” That’s it. Nothing more. Nothing about how the Green Deal enhances competitiveness and creates thousands of new jobs; nothing about nature and biodiversity; nothing about pollution and health; and nothing about the need for urgent climate action to curb emissions in time. This proposed downgrading comes at a time when climate action has never been more urgent. Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary, UN Climate Change, said in a speech earlier this week: ”The next two years are essential in saving our planet. We still have a change to make greenhouse emissions tumble, with a new generation of climate plans. But we need there stronger plans, now.” Ingmar Rentzhog, CEO and founder of We Don’t Have Time, says the content of the leaked document is extremely concerning. ”It’s obvious that powerful fossil fuel interests have a strong ability to influence political leadership in many European countries. But what is extra worrying this time is that they seem to be succeeding in playing down the EU climate agenda already before the upcoming EU elections.” Read the leaked document in its entirety here. This leaked draft of the EU Strategic Agenda is an internal working document, which means it can still be improved. But because of the upcoming European Elections, it is more likely that the final version will be even more watered-down than the draft. The draft version has already passed through the first two phases. The first was The letter of intent, sent by President Charles Michel, President of the European Council, to the Heads of State and government on June 24, 2023. The second was the Granada Declaration, which was adopted by the member states on October 6, 2023. The next important step is the informal Council Summit in Brussels, Belgium, on April 17. At this summit, EU leaders might adopt another declaration. If not, the document will be finally approved at the European Council Summit on 27-28 June, approximately three weeks after the European Parliament Election on 6-9 June. Once the election results are known, Charles Michel will draft the final text of the Strategic Agenda for sign-off by the Member States. And that’s when things might become even more worrying. Several polls so far have shown that this election might bring significantly more power to the parties that are already today lobbying for a weakened climate agenda in Europe. In a new report, titled ”A Sharp Right Turn: A Forecast for the 2024 European Parliament Elections,” the authors warn that “a populist right coalition of Christian democrats, conservatives, and radical right MEPs could emerge with a majority for the first time” in the history of the European Parliament. According to the authors, such a “sharp right turn” is ”likely to have significant consequences for European-level policies, which will affect the foreign policy choices that the EU can make, particularly on environmental issues, where the new majority is likely to oppose ambitious EU action to tackle climate change.” The good news is that there is still time to call on EU leaders to rework this draft and re-introduce climate action as a main priority in the strategic agenda. But how? Here are two ways you can help push for the EU to strengthen its climate policy instead of going in another direction: - Inform the media. One of the best ways to get political leaders to act and react is via TV, newspapers, and other news media. Find the contact info of the news editors on the website of your favorite news organization, and inform them about the leaked document. You can use this pre-written message when sending your email. - Vote. If you are a European citizen, vote for the climate in the upcoming European Parliament. Read up on your candidates and vote for those who support – and push fore – an ambitious climate agenda. ABOUT: THE EU STRATEGIC AGENDA - Every five years, EU leaders agree on the EU's political priorities for the future. It is a collective effort led by the President of the European Council, where leaders discuss and decide together. It takes place in the context of the European Parliament elections and ahead of the appointment of each European Commission. - Charles Michel, President of the European Council, is leading the process by working collectively and inclusively with EU countries' leaders. - The informal European Council meeting on 6 October 2023 in Granada, Spain, was the first time EU leaders had debated future priorities for the strategic agenda. - In November 2023 President Michel launched a round of consultations to deepen discussions on key questions related to policies, financing and decision-making. The first of these consultations took place in Berlin, Copenhagen, Zagreb and Paris. In April 2024, the second consultation round will take place in Vilnius, Bucharest, Warsaw and Vienna. - The strategic agenda is set to be adopted in June 2024.
Patrick Kiash
4 w
•
•
"Illustrations indicating the effects of climate change, if we continue the deforestation and destruction of our environment'' In a world where the absence of trees is unimaginable, these silent giants stand as the unsung heroes of our planet, embodying the very essence of life. Trees not only bestow beauty upon our surroundings but also serve as the pillars of sustenance for countless ecosystems. Without them, the very food we cherish would cease to exist, from luscious papayas to refreshing coconuts, each product of their bountiful provision. "A great visitor attending one of our function at mount Kenya university and they planted trees of memories in the institution" However, the significance of trees transcends mere nourishment; they act as nature's guardians, staunchly defending our lands against the ravages of erosion. In a landscape where fertile soils are at constant risk of being stripped bare by wind and rain, trees serve as nature's steadfast defense, anchoring the earth with their roots and shielding it with their branches. "Above we are doing campaign at Kenyatta University campaigning to all generations that they have right to protect the planet, as we don't have planet B" "A great visitor attending one of our function at mount Kenya university and they planted trees of memories in the institution" Breathing in the crisp, clean air, have you ever pondered its source? Look no further than the nearest tree. Through the wondrous process of photosynthesis, trees exhale life-giving oxygen while absorbing carbon dioxide, a vital exchange that sustains both humans and animals alike. Moreover, the comfort of seeking refuge under a leafy canopy on a scorching summer day is unparalleled. Trees provide shade, offering respite from the relentless sun, and in doing so, they also cool the air around us. But their generosity extends far beyond mere shade; through the intricate process of transpiration, trees play a pivotal role in regulating our planet's water cycle, ensuring a steady flow of freshwater for all. '' Instilling hope to our children's and generations that we can do it'' Yet, perhaps even more remarkable are the medicinal marvels hidden within their leaves, bark, and roots. From the ancient neem tree to countless others, trees offer a treasure trove of remedies for ailments big and small, their healing touch revered for centuries. However, despite their undeniable importance, our world is facing a crisis. Deforestation threatens to unravel the delicate balance of nature, leading to catastrophic consequences for all life forms. But there is hope. Across the globe, individuals and organizations are banding together to plant trees and reclaim lost forests. One such initiative is Trees for Future, awarded the prestigious title of UN World Restoration Flagship for their empowering work with African farmers '' Tree planting in One of school events at Kenya''. Give Climate Love 💚 to Trees for the Future: TREES Named UN World Restoration Flagship for empowering African farmers | We Don't Have Time https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/3123e469-5bfe-4d0f-bf1d-f65c124d3229 Trees for the Future (TREES) has been named one of seven UN World Restoration Flagships for its work in empowering African farmers to combat environmental degradation. Congratulations! 💚 Spanning from Senegal to Tanzania "We Don't Have Time-Kenya Chapter team in collaboration with Trees for Future'' 'Above is certificate We Don't Have Time, got recognized by one of their partners for their contribution in tree planting for everyone who joins the platform or writes a review that hits 50 agrees and above'' Their collaboration with We Don't Have Time has yielded remarkable results, with over 160,000 trees planted, and the We Don't Have Time Kenya chapter alone has contributed over 10,000 trees to this cause where we have planted trees in learning institutions, companies, along river banks, in estates and many more places . You can join the challenge and help us plant a forest through https://app.wedonthavetime.org/posts/867ab5d6-634e-4ca4-9c25-6c5c8716ac07?utm_source=app%26utm_medium=topstory%26utm_campaign=treechallenge#/ ''Great Link where together we can plant more trees, join us''. ''One of the running We Don't Have Time Challenges of tree planting... Where together we can plant forest join us using above link-:)'' From the grassroots efforts of Nobel laureate Wangari Maathai to the tireless work of conservationists everywhere, the movement for reforestation is gaining momentum. Each tree planted is a beacon of hope, a symbol of resilience in the face of adversity. So, let's heed the call of the wild, embrace the spirit of stewardship, and together, ensure that our planet remains a vibrant, thriving oasis for all. The time to act is now. Let's conserve our environment, plant more trees, and pave the way for a brighter tomorrow. Our actions today will shape the world of tomorrow. Together, we are the solution to climate change. Together, we can make a lasting impact. ''Above is one of our Kenyan icon and Nobel peace prize winner 2024 Wangari Mathai in one of her past events''. ''Above is Kenyan team, planting trees in Thika Estates''. Below is a depiction in some areas in our African communities
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Comparing companies in terms of carbon emissions has always been difficult. Sometimes even impossible. Until now. Welcome to We Don’t Have Time’s emissions ranking. Let’s say you're a customer who wants to make a sustainable choice when buying a new pair of shoes, or a citizen eager to pick a green bank for your savings account. Or maybe you are an investor trying to reduce the climate footprint of your investments, a purchaser aiming to reduce your company’s value-chain emissions, or a journalist struggling to publish a climate ranking of companies in the construction sector. All are faced with the same kind of questions: How do you compare the companies you need to compare? What numbers should you use? Where do you even find the data? Not easy. But what if there was a platform where you could simply search for a company’s name and see the emissions data right away? And if this platform made it easy to compare companies regardless of size and revenue. We Don’t Have Time is currently developing such a feature. All emissions included For each company added to this ranking, we display revenue intensity (i.e. emissions divided by revenue), which allows us to compare emissions regardless of the organization’s size. Revenue intensity includes all emissions that an organization causes in its operations (Scope 1) and wider value chain (Scopes 2 and 3). The “Scope” classification has been developed by the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the world’s most widely used greenhouse gas accounting standard. It’s a way to help companies and organizations prevent double counting, and to classify the greenhouse gas emissions into manageable and measurable categories. Understanding these scopes helps organizations identify where their emissions come from and develop strategies to reduce their overall carbon footprint, not just within their immediate operations but throughout their entire value chain. Stricter reporting rules in the EU and the US Up until now, reporting Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions has been voluntary for most companies. But this is rapidly changing, not least because of the new EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Starting with the 2024 financial year, 11,700 of the largest companies doing business in the European Union are required to follow these requirements. According to the European Parliament, this number will gradually increase to around 50,000 large, medium, and small companies in 2028. In the United States new, stricter climate reporting rules are being planned as well. Last year, the biggest economy in the U.S., the state of California, passed the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (CCDAA). This new law will require large public and private companies doing business in California to disclose their scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, starting in 2026. To succeed with this reporting, these companies will also start demanding strict emissions reporting from their suppliers and business partners. This means the new reporting standards will affect small and medium-sized companies all over the world. Here is a short explanation of scope 1,2 and 3 emissions: Scope 1 Emissions: These are direct emissions that come from sources that are owned or controlled by a company or organization. Examples: - Emissions from burning fuel in company-owned vehicles. - Emissions from on-site machinery and equipment. Emissions from chemical reactions in industrial processes. Scope 2 Emissions: These are indirect emissions associated with the consumption of purchased energy. These emissions come from the generation of electricity, heat, or steam that a company uses but doesn't produce itself. Examples include: - Emissions from the power plants that supply electricity to a company. - Emissions from the burning of fuel to generate heat for a company's buildings. Scope 3 Emissions: These are indirect emissions that occur as a result of the company's activities, but from sources not owned or controlled by the company. They often involve the entire supply chain, including both upstream emissions (from raw material, producing parts or other items that are delivered to the company and used in the production) and downstream emissions emissions (emissions caused by the product after it has been sold or delivered). Examples include: - Emissions from the extraction and production of raw materials used in manufacturing. - Emissions from the transportation of goods and services. - Emissions from the use and disposal of products sold by the company. All these emissions are included in our emissions ranking. See our current version of our emissions ranking: https://app.wedonthavetime.org/categories/086954b8-27d6-412d-9378-93b7cfc65c3d As you will notice, many companies and organizations don't yet have their emissions data on their profiles. You can help us add this data if you want to, by going to the company’s profile and clicking Report data. If the company is reporting its emissions data, you will most probably find it in its sustainability reports or annual reports. Not all organizations publish their emissions data, but more and more will because of the new EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), mentioned earlier. Please note that this is a beta feature. We’d be happy to receive your feedback and ideas on how we can improve. Contact our editor Markus Lutteman at: markus.lutteman@ https://wedonthavetime.org
Shared by Patrick Kiash
Edwin wangombe
4 w
•
The initiative taken by the people of Pahang, Malaysia, to convert food scraps into organic fertilizer after breaking their Ramadan fast is immensely beneficial for the environment in multiple ways. Firstly, by diverting food waste away from landfills, this action significantly reduces the environmental burden associated with landfill waste. Food waste in landfills contributes to methane emissions, a potent greenhouse gas that exacerbates climate change. By processing 25 kilograms of scraps a day, even though it's a modest amount compared to the total waste generated, the initiative sets a crucial example of waste reduction and resource utilization. https://phys.org/news/2024-04-malaysian-state-ramadan-food-fertilizer.html Moreover, the process of converting food scraps into organic fertilizer promotes sustainable agriculture practices. Instead of relying on chemical fertilizers that can have harmful effects on soil health and water systems, farmers can now use the nutrient-rich organic fertilizer derived from recycled food waste. This not only enriches the soil but also fosters healthier crop growth without the negative environmental consequences associated with chemical inputs. Furthermore, the closed-loop nature of this initiative creates a sustainable cycle of resource utilization. The organic fertilizer produced from food scraps feeds crops, which in turn produce more food. As Abdul Shukor Mohamad Salleh aptly pointed out, there's a natural cycle at play here, where waste is transformed into a valuable resource, promoting sustainability and resilience in food production systems. Additionally, by reducing the reliance on expensive chemical inputs, farmers like Zulyna Mohamed Nordin are not only saving costs but also embracing natural, eco-friendly alternatives that enhance productivity. Her testimony of witnessing bigger and greener vegetables demonstrates the tangible benefits of using organic fertilizer derived from recycled food waste. Overall, the initiative undertaken by the people of Pahang showcases a proactive approach towards environmental conservation and sustainable development. It not only addresses the pressing issue of food waste but also promotes a more holistic and environmentally friendly approach to agriculture, contributing positively to the health of ecosystems and communities alike.
25 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.