Climate warning
Image of Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo

Climate warning

Top US banks face calls to wind down fossil-fuel financing


Image of post in post detailed view

Three large US banks face shareholder calls on Tuesday to wind down fossil fuel financing, a balancing act for them and their top investors who are also under political pressure from the other side to maintain support of the oil and gas industries.
The resolutions were filed by climate-minded investor activists at Bank of America (BAC.N), Citigroup (C.N) and Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N). All three banks say the nonbinding measures calling for policies to phase out lending and underwriting for new fossil fuel exploration and development are not necessary given their other commitments to reaching net-zero emissions by 2050.
Similar resolutions won no more than 13% support at the banks' meetings last year. Proponents including the Sierra Club Foundation loosened the language this year partly by dropping a call for a planning deadline.
Vote results at the banks' annual meetings will show how big Wall Street firms practice concerns for environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. U.S. Republican politicians accuse Wall Street of embracing ESG matters over profits, while climate protesters spray painted graffiti on two New York bank offices on Monday.
Heidi Welsh, executive director of the Sustainable Investments Institute, which tracks shareholder votes, said support from 20% or more of each bank's investors would be significant for the activists. "If you get at least 20%, then you're in the game," she said.
Ben Cushing, a Sierra Club campaign director, said the resolution results should be seen in context with how other environmental proposals fare. Together the resolutions, Cushing said, "represent a substantial challenge to big banks’ narrative that they are adequately managing and mitigating climate risks."
Investors including Britain's Legal & General have voiced support for the phase-out proposals. But on Monday, without naming individual banks, Neuberger Berman leaders wrote they oppose phase-out resolutions since the targeted banks "are highly transparent in their disclosure of business exposures and lending strategies."

Do you agree?

31 more agrees trigger social media ads

  • Tabitha Kimani

    64 w

    The investors should move their investments to climate friendly banks.

    11
    • Daniel Waweru

      64 w

      They should understand they negative impacts the fossil fuels has and stay off in financing such acts. This is so uncalled for

      13

      Write a comment...

      Write a climate review

      Voice your opinion on how businesses and organizations impact the climate.
      0 trees planted

      One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.

      Download the app

      We plant a tree for every new user.

      AppleAndroid