Frederic John
24 w
πΆ ππ₯π₯ π π°ππ§π ππ¨π« ππ‘π«π’π¬ππ¦ππ¬ π’π¬... πππππ! π And that's what we got with the national Belgian TV and radio channel about the topical debate on whether cities should switch off Christmas lights to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Beyond the symbolic effort, the impact is ridiculously minor compared to other sources of CO2 emissions a City can emit. For example, the Belgium city of LiΓ¨ge (200k residents) is expected to emit the equivalent of 6 tCO2 to power Christmas lights. Is it a lot? At an individual level, yes. But at the scale of a City, it is peanuts. To compare, 6 tCO2 is equivalent to a compact petrol car driven for 30k km. City of LiΓ¨ge operates 440 vehicles. Hence, reducing the fleet by <0,3% would offset all emissions from these festive lights. Most of the time, actions to reduce emissions efficiently are hidden and sometimes require uncomfortable changes. But it always starts by measuring the big picture with a CO2 inventory to make the right decisions. Christmas lighting is a perfect example of organisations taking blindly inefficient actions to reduce emissions without metrics. We cannot reduce what we do not measure. https://www.rtbf.be/article/eteindre-les-illuminations-de-noel-dans-les-villes-pour-economiser-lenergie-une-mesure-principalement-symbolique-infographies-11116328 #sustainability #christmas #christmaslights #carbonemissions #co2
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. Itβs easy and it works.
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogueβ’.