Climate change is a global issue that affects everyone on the planet, but not equally. Although some countries are less responsible for emitting greenhouse gases (GHGs) than others, it does not mean that they are not responsible for taking action to combat climate change. Ghana is a perfect case study to demonstrate that developing countries, despite having lower emissions, are also vulnerable to the effects of climate change, and rich countries should take more responsibility to address the issue. Ghana is a country located in West Africa, with a population of approximately 30 million people. It is a developing country with a rapidly growing economy, heavily dependent on agriculture and natural resources. Ghana has a relatively low level of GHG emissions, contributing only 0.06% of the world's total emissions. However, despite having low emissions, Ghana is highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. The country's economy relies heavily on agriculture, which is already being affected by climate change. Droughts, floods, and other extreme weather events are becoming more frequent and intense, leading to crop failure and food insecurity. The fishing industry is also being impacted, as warming oceans and changing weather patterns are affecting fish migration patterns and causing fish populations to decline. Additionally, Ghana is experiencing more frequent and intense heatwaves, which are having a significant impact on the health of the population. The elderly, children, and those with underlying health conditions are particularly vulnerable, with heat-related illnesses such as dehydration, heat exhaustion, and heatstroke becoming more common. Moreover, Ghana's coastline is also threatened by sea-level rise, leading to coastal erosion, loss of habitat, and saltwater intrusion, which affects agricultural lands and freshwater resources. This situation not only affects the environment but also the livelihoods of the population. Therefore, even though Ghana emits a relatively small amount of GHGs, it is still vulnerable to the effects of climate change, which has serious consequences on the country's economy, environment, and social wellbeing. On the other hand, rich countries, which are responsible for the majority of the world's GHG emissions, have a greater responsibility to combat climate change. These countries have historically benefited from burning fossil fuels and have built their economies on the exploitation of natural resources. Therefore, they should take more significant action to reduce their GHG emissions and support developing countries like Ghana in their efforts to adapt to the effects of climate change. There are several ways that rich countries can support Ghana and other developing countries in their efforts to tackle climate change. One way is by providing financial and technical assistance to support the development of renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, and to improve energy efficiency. This support can help reduce GHG emissions while promoting sustainable economic development. Another way is by supporting climate adaptation measures, such as building sea walls and improving irrigation systems, to help Ghana adapt to the effects of climate change. This support can help protect vulnerable communities and promote resilience to the impacts of climate change. In conclusion, the argument that "my country only emits 0.06% of emissions" is not a valid excuse for rich countries to avoid taking action on climate change. Ghana, a country with low emissions, is still vulnerable to the effects of climate change and requires support from the international community to tackle the issue. Rich countries have a greater responsibility to take action on climate change, given their historical contribution to the problem. Supporting developing countries like Ghana in their efforts to reduce GHG emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change is not only the right thing to do but also essential for building a more sustainable and resilient future for everyone.