Ulf Kristersson
Climate warning
Climate warning
Markus Lutteman
32 w
•
For nominating a climate denier as head of Sweden's OSCE delegation
The climate crisis is considered a ”threat multiplier” by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), since it affects and accelerates threats in so many sectors, such as food production, sustainable development, economy, forestry, tourism, security and peace. Now Ulf Kristersson, likely to become Sweden's new prime minister, has nominated the outspoken climate denier Björn Söder of the Sweden Democrats to be the new chair of the Permanent Delegation of Sweden to the OSCE. In 2019 Björn Söder said ”the climate crisis is just a big hoax” during a political debate, and he has repeatedly downplayed or questioned climate science ever since. This is such a disgrace for Sweden, and also a mockery of the work of the OSCE. Dear Ulf Kristersson, please rethink this embarrassing nomination. About the nomination (in Swedish); https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/bjorn-soder-sd-kandidat-for-ordforandepost-pa-osse About OSCE and climate change: https://www.osce.org/oceea/446296 Picture: Björn Söder (to the left) and Ulf Kristersson.
Do you agree?
147 more agrees trigger social media ads
Welcome, let's solve the climate crisis together
Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.
Write a climate review
Voice your opinion on how businesses and organizations impact the climate.
Open for Climate Dialogue™
Certified accounts actively looking for your opinion on their climate impact.
125.5k trees planted
One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.
Download the app
We plant a tree for every new user.
•
•
•
24 w
Dear Markus Lutteman Thank you for getting your climate warning to level 2! We have reached out to Ulf Kristersson and asked for a response. I will keep you updated on any progress! /Muhammad We Don't Have Time
•
•
24 w
Yikes!
•
•
28 w
We need doers, not deniers. I don't understand politicians, who are supposed to make smart decisions now and for the future, instead making decisions that even small children understand are not good.
•
32 w
⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
•
•
32 w
This is a very bad decision. How can one talk about security without talking about climate change??? (this is a rethoric question: you can't)
•
•
32 w
This is a shameful decision, but I feel that it's only the beginning...