We need such leaders who are speaking out to save the planet.

Removal of subsidy will discourage the use of harmful greenhouse gases

Any subsidy that is of harm to the environment should be phased out.

Beautiful work innit

Great work

Commendable

Ajay Banga's call to discuss and reduce subsidies for agriculture, fuel, and fisheries that have a negative environmental impact is a step in the right direction. It's crucial to acknowledge that such subsidies can exacerbate climate change and hinder our efforts to address this pressing global issue. By reevaluating these subsidies, we can not only redirect urgently needed funds towards climate change mitigation and environmental conservation but also encourage more sustainable practices in these industries. This action aligns with the goal of creating a greener and more environmentally responsible future. It's a reminder that addressing climate change requires a multifaceted approach, and reconsidering these subsidies is an important part of that process. 🌱💡🌍 #ClimateChange #EnvironmentalImpact #SubsidyReform

Governments are spending trillions on inefficient subsidies that are making climate change worse, money that could be tapped to help solve the climate change menace.

I second that... Anything that harms the environment should not be subsidized

This is a crucial step towards sustainable progress. It aligns with the need to incentivize eco-friendly practices and transition towards a greener economy.

Reducing subsidies that harm the environment is a necessary step towards addressing climate change, and it's encouraging to see leaders like Ajay Banga calling for these discussions.

sensible