Climate warning
Image of Europa

Europa

Climate warning

85% of global companies don’t have credible plans to reduce corporate flying emissions

World’s largest companies fail to set targets on most climate intensive form of business travel - air travel

85% of global companies are failing to set ambitious targets to reduce corporate travel emissions, reveals the second edition of a ranking on business travel by The Travel Smart Campaign.

Only 50 companies out of 322 have set targets to reduce business travel emissions. Of the companies who have targets, only four companies receive the “gold standard”, i.e. report air travel emissions and commit to reducing them by 50% or more, by 2025 or sooner. These are Novo Nordisk (Pharmaceuticals, Denmark), Swiss Re (Finance, Switzerland), Fidelity International (Finance, United Kingdom) and ABN Amro (Finance, Netherlands).

In the first ever overview of reporting of non-CO2 emissions related to business flying, the ranking finds that 40 companies are leading the way by reporting all greenhouse gas emissions associated with corporate flights. Pharmaceutical giants AstraZeneca and Pfizer and consulting companies Boston Consulting Group and Deloitte set the example by considering the full impact of flying in their reporting.

The climate impact of business flying extends further than CO2 emissions. On top of CO2, aircraft engines emit other gases – nitrous oxides, sulphur dioxide and water – and particulate matter (soot). These are commonly referred to as non-CO2 emissions, and it is estimated that they account for two thirds of total climate warming from flying. Yet only very few companies reflect the total impact of business flights by accounting for non-CO2 effects.

Denise Auclair, corporate travel manager at Transport & Environment, said: “Corporates are turning a blind eye to the harms done by flying for work. Most companies are taking little to no action on business flying, which renders any other travel targets meaningless in the context of tackling climate change. Only few frontrunners align with science by reporting non-CO2 emissions – the hidden part of the iceberg of aviation’s full climate impact”.

Volkswagen, KPMG and Johnson & Johnson are the top three emitters of the Travel Smart Ranking without a target to reduce their travel emissions. But setting such targets is possible and necessary, as companies of similar size and sector like McKinsey, Deloitte and AstraZeneca have done so.

The study shows that if 10% of companies – the biggest emitters of the ranking – set 50% reduction targets, this would go half the way towards achieving the global target of -50% in corporate air travel emissions by 2025. Reducing aviation emissions is now more crucial than ever, if we are to stay within 1.5°C of global warming.

For the critical decade until 2030, the best way to reduce aviation emissions is to fly less, as the timing for scale-up of sustainable fuels and zero-emissions aircraft is currently post-2030, and offsetting cannot substitute for reducing emissions.

The Travel Smart Campaign calls upon companies to set ambitious targets to reduce corporate travel emissions, switch from air to rail travel where possible, and privilege video conferencing as a substitute to long-haul flying.

Denise Auclair concludes: “The biggest emitters have a disproportionate role to play in reducing their corporate flying emissions. The means to achieve this are more accessible than ever before: rail travel when distances permit it and video conferencing to avoid long-haul flights.”


Transport & Environment, together with a coalition of global partners, launched the Travel Smart Campaign in 2022 with a yearly edition of a corporate ranking on sustainable business travel practices. The campaign engages with businesses, with the objective that they reduce their corporate travel emissions by 50% or more of pre-Covid levels by 2025 or sooner.​

The Travel Smart Ranking, ranks 322 US, European and Indian companies according to 10 indicators, relating to air travel emissions, reduction targets and reporting. Top global flyers from the 17 countries of the ranking represent a sizable portion of business travel worldwide. The analysis sheds light on the significant efforts certain global businesses have still to make to reduce their corporate travel emissions. Companies are given an A, B, C or D grade. In this year’s edition of the ranking, 11 companies qualified for an A grade, 38 a B, whilst the overwhelming majority received a C (212) and 61 companies saw a D grade next to their name.








Do you agree?

23 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient

  • walter lungayi

    63 w

    actions to be done . its an emergency

    2
    • Patrik Lobergh

      63 w

      @walter_lungayi 85% of corporates has disqualified themselves, hence it needs global and regional policies

    • Daniel Waweru

      63 w

      Its time for action and action should be from everyone

      4
      • Patrik Lobergh

        63 w

        @daniel_waweru_656 It need policys for corporate travels, taxes on kerosin and a shift in mindset from consumers: take the train, bicycle or even the car but no flights

      • Joseph Githinji

        64 w

        The numbers of companies not ready for change is discouraging. It's time for action for the sake of our climate

        3
        • Patrik Lobergh

          63 w

          @joseph_githinji If corporates are unable to put a company policy in place (how difficult could that be....), then we will push EU to enforce such a European Policy

          1
          • Joseph Githinji

            63 w

            @patrik_lobergh seems like it's the option they have left us with. EU the ball is in your court let's do this

            • Patrik Lobergh

              63 w

              @joseph_githinji 👍

            • Edwin wangombe

              64 w

              And it's really a shame knowing that our planet is at stake

              1
              • mercy nduta

                64 w

                Emissions from aviation are a significant contributor to climate change.

                9
                • Tabitha Kimani

                  64 w

                  I wish they could get serious because lack of actions will affect generations.

                  1
                  • Munene Mugambi

                    64 w

                    Reduce air hours

                    1
                    • Patrik Lobergh

                      64 w

                      @munene_mugambi For the 85% of the companies who are lacking a credible plan...😊

                      1
                    • Majdi Alnajjar

                      64 w

                      Keep it going 💡

                      8
                      Welcome, let's solve the climate crisis together
                      Post youtube preview with preloading
                      youtube overlay

                      Write or agree to climate reviews to make businesses and world leaders act. It’s easy and it works.

                      Write a climate review

                      Voice your opinion on how businesses and organizations impact the climate.
                      0 trees planted

                      One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.

                      Download the app

                      We plant a tree for every new user.

                      AppleAndroid