The National Archives
Climate warning
Climate warning
Paul Krogh
182 w
The Time is Now!
UN climate leader's - Please read this survey and ask yourself if this is the world you would want anyone to grow up in!?
One young person said;
" I don't want to die, but I don't want to grow up in a world that doesn't care for children and animals"
I'm in absolute agreement with this view - are you?
Leaders, STOP acting for and on behalf of current vested interests and start acting for and on behalf of the greater good of all of humanity.
Some people would like to portray environmental protection as theft! It isn't theft, it's a gift.... A gift that forthcoming generations should always have had, without question, a sustainable future! This is your reminder that you stole from them, you stole from their future! Now it's time to do the right thing.
No Greenwash, no back sliding, no excuses, the time is now and only you the UN and global leadership can do it.
BBC News - Climate change: Young people very worried - survey
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-58549373
Do you agree?
69 more agrees trigger contact with the recipient
Watch our Latest Broadcasts!
We need to stop methane and #BuyMoreTime
We'll plant a tree for you
And together we've planted over 150,000 trees. One tree is planted for every climate review written to an organization that is Open for Climate Dialogue™.
How does this work?
The Climate Action App
We plant a tree for every new user
•
182 w
https://www.empire.kred/missions/view?id=20308504 @empirekred mission to promote. Help the Youth - It's Their Future
•
182 w
@Nevahirdova, interesting link, can you tell us more?
•
182 w
@paul_krogh Empire.Kred is an online game for building real world Influence. Players buy and sell each other,[2] and earn currency by completing real world Social Missions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire.Kred It's Fun Paul and can generate attention to your cause. Greg.
•
182 w
I think the best thing that could happen with COP26 would be if the conference centre was submerged in a metre of floodwater on day one in order to focus people on system change. Rather than weak targets for 29 years from now.
•
182 w
That would certainly focus minds. Thanks for sharing Chris.
•
182 w
All cop26 have been disappointing in practice. A complete consensus is always asked, a minimal agreement with not many holding up to it.
•
182 w
Thanks for the comments Jehannes. I thought the Paris agreement 2015 was considered a major step forward?
•
182 w
@paul_krogh It was. It was unprecedented in its unanimity (apart from one or two countries) but despite all the pledges, not enough has changed. Putting the Business Secretary (Alok Sharma - https://is.gd/O7rS8I - note the lack of green credentials) in charge of COP26 might be a bit like putting a fox in charge of a chicken coop but I guess we'll see soon. And pay for it with our lives if that appointment was wrong.
•
182 w
@BeeVee Interesting perspective. I agree, lots needs to change. The process of human motivation is a complex issue especially in multi lateral agreement. Perhaps there might be a deeper (for deeper see more superficial) unifying rational for the appointment. You're absolutely right though, if the outcome isn't successful, the outcome for these young people is relatively bleak. Maybe the appointment is highly strategic? Do we know much about past appointments?
•
182 w
No Greenwashing, no back sliding and no excuses
•
182 w
Sounds like the agreements reached wont break your criteria but only because they are such tiny accomodations.
•
182 w
@denise_engle Thanks, that's very encouraging. I'm always trying to think about accessibility these days to maximize inclusivity (while we might be science literate, not everyone is). Maybe you saw this? https://www.anthropocenemagazine.org/2021/09/people-dont-know-what-climate-experts-are-talking-about